Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Filters

Kyle B Brothers

Showing results (71-80 of 93) with videos related to

Pageof 10
Sort By:
American Journal of Human Genetics|April 6, 2019
The Responsibility to Recontact Research Participants after Reinterpretation of Genetic and Genomic Research ResultsYvonne Bombard, Kyle B Brothers, Sara Fitzgerald-Butt, et al.
The Journal of Pediatrics|October 20, 2015
When Participants in Genomic Research Grow Up: Contact and Consent at the Age of MajorityKyle B Brothers, Ingrid A Holm, Janet E Childerhose, et al.
Genetics in Medicine : Official Journal of the American College of Medical Genetics|July 7, 2018
Developing a conceptual, reproducible, rubric-based approach to consent and result disclosure for genetic testing by clinicians with minimal genetics backgroundKelly E Ormond, Miranda L G Hallquist, Adam H Buchanan, et al.
Genetics in Medicine : Official Journal of the American College of Medical Genetics|August 26, 2016
Eliciting preferences on secondary findings: the Preferences Instrument for Genomic Secondary ResultsKyle B Brothers, Kelly M East, Whitley V Kelley, et al.
American Journal of Human Genetics|September 2, 2022
Addressing underrepresentation in genomics research through community engagementAmy A Lemke, Edward D Esplin, Aaron J Goldenberg, et al.
The Patient|October 18, 2021
Perceived Utility of Genomic Sequencing: Qualitative Analysis and Synthesis of a Conceptual Model to Inform Patient-Centered Instrument DevelopmentHadley Stevens Smith, Stephanie R Morain, Jill Oliver Robinson, et al.
Genetics in Medicine : Official Journal of the American College of Medical Genetics|January 23, 2025
Genomic sequencing in diverse and underserved pediatric populations: Parent perspectives on understanding, uncertainty, psychosocial impact, and personal utility of resultsBarbara B Biesecker, Sara L Ackerman, Kyle B Brothers, et al.
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA|December 28, 2018
Enrichment sampling for a multi-site patient survey using electronic health records and census dataNathaniel D Mercaldo, Kyle B Brothers, David S Carrell, et al.
Genetics in Medicine : Official Journal of the American College of Medical Genetics|May 24, 2018
Genomic sequencing identifies secondary findings in a cohort of parent study participantsMichelle L Thompson, Candice R Finnila, Kevin M Bowling, et al.
Genetics in Medicine : Official Journal of the American College of Medical Genetics|February 25, 2012
Return of individual research results from genome-wide association studies: experience of the Electronic Medical Records and Genomics (eMERGE) NetworkStephanie M Fullerton, Wendy A Wolf, Kyle B Brothers, et al.
Pageof 10

Showing results (71-80 of 93) with videos related to

Sort By:
Pageof 10
American Journal of Human Genetics|April 6, 2019
The Responsibility to Recontact Research Participants after Reinterpretation of Genetic and Genomic Research ResultsYvonne Bombard, Kyle B Brothers, Sara Fitzgerald-Butt, et al.
The Journal of Pediatrics|October 20, 2015
When Participants in Genomic Research Grow Up: Contact and Consent at the Age of MajorityKyle B Brothers, Ingrid A Holm, Janet E Childerhose, et al.
Genetics in Medicine : Official Journal of the American College of Medical Genetics|July 7, 2018
Developing a conceptual, reproducible, rubric-based approach to consent and result disclosure for genetic testing by clinicians with minimal genetics backgroundKelly E Ormond, Miranda L G Hallquist, Adam H Buchanan, et al.
Genetics in Medicine : Official Journal of the American College of Medical Genetics|August 26, 2016
Eliciting preferences on secondary findings: the Preferences Instrument for Genomic Secondary ResultsKyle B Brothers, Kelly M East, Whitley V Kelley, et al.
American Journal of Human Genetics|September 2, 2022
Addressing underrepresentation in genomics research through community engagementAmy A Lemke, Edward D Esplin, Aaron J Goldenberg, et al.
The Patient|October 18, 2021
Perceived Utility of Genomic Sequencing: Qualitative Analysis and Synthesis of a Conceptual Model to Inform Patient-Centered Instrument DevelopmentHadley Stevens Smith, Stephanie R Morain, Jill Oliver Robinson, et al.
Genetics in Medicine : Official Journal of the American College of Medical Genetics|January 23, 2025
Genomic sequencing in diverse and underserved pediatric populations: Parent perspectives on understanding, uncertainty, psychosocial impact, and personal utility of resultsBarbara B Biesecker, Sara L Ackerman, Kyle B Brothers, et al.
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA|December 28, 2018
Enrichment sampling for a multi-site patient survey using electronic health records and census dataNathaniel D Mercaldo, Kyle B Brothers, David S Carrell, et al.
Genetics in Medicine : Official Journal of the American College of Medical Genetics|May 24, 2018
Genomic sequencing identifies secondary findings in a cohort of parent study participantsMichelle L Thompson, Candice R Finnila, Kevin M Bowling, et al.
Genetics in Medicine : Official Journal of the American College of Medical Genetics|February 25, 2012
Return of individual research results from genome-wide association studies: experience of the Electronic Medical Records and Genomics (eMERGE) NetworkStephanie M Fullerton, Wendy A Wolf, Kyle B Brothers, et al.
Pageof 10