Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Filters

Lawrence Liberti

Showing results (11-20 of 29) with videos related to

Pageof 3
Sort By:
Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice|September 17, 2020
An evaluation of the Caribbean regulatory system centralized assessment process for medicines submitted 2017-2018 using the OpERA methodologyLawrence Liberti, Rian Marie Extavour, Prisha Patel, et al.
BMJ Open|November 28, 2019
To what degree are review outcomes aligned for new active substances (NASs) between the European Medicines Agency and the US Food and Drug Administration? A comparison based on publicly available information for NASs initially approved in the time period 2014 to 2016Thomas Christian Kühler, Magda Bujar, Neil McAuslane, et al.
Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science|September 21, 2018
An Analysis of Regulatory Timing and Outcomes for New Drug Applications Submitted to Swissmedic: Comparison With the US Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines AgencyPetra Dörr, Alison Wadworth, Tina Wang, et al.
Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science|February 3, 2020
A Proposed Framework for a Globally Applicable Pragmatic Approach to Using Facilitated Regulatory PathwaysLawrence Liberti, Neil McAuslane, Pieter Stolk, et al.
Value in Health : the Journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research|June 19, 2018
Building Synergy between Regulatory and HTA Agencies beyond Processes and Procedures-Can We Effectively Align the Evidentiary Requirements? A Survey of Stakeholder PerceptionsTing Wang, Neil McAuslane, Lawrence Liberti, et al.
Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science|September 18, 2018
A Universal Framework for the Benefit-Risk Assessment of Medicines: Is This the Way Forward?Stuart Walker, Neil McAuslane, Lawrence Liberti, et al.
Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science|July 4, 2020
Use of the Certificate for Pharmaceutical Products (CPP) in 18 Maturing Pharmaceutical Markets: Comparing Agency Guidelines with Company PracticeCéline Rodier, Magda Bujar, Neil McAuslane, et al.
Clinical Therapeutics|April 22, 2021
Transparency in European Medicines Agency and US Food and Drug Administration Decision Making: Is It Possible to Identify the Rationale for Divergences in Approved Indication From Public Assessment Reports?Magda Bujar, Sara Ferragu, Neil McAuslane, et al.
Frontiers in Pharmacology|January 4, 2021
Companies' Health Technology Assessment Strategies and Practices in Australia, Canada, England, France, Germany, Italy and Spain: An Industry Metrics StudyTing Wang, Neil McAuslane, Lawrence Liberti, et al.
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care|September 8, 2020
Benchmarking health technology assessment agencies-methodological challenges and recommendationsTing Wang, Iga Lipska, Neil McAuslane, et al.
Pageof 3

Showing results (11-20 of 29) with videos related to

Sort By:
Pageof 3
Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice|September 17, 2020
An evaluation of the Caribbean regulatory system centralized assessment process for medicines submitted 2017-2018 using the OpERA methodologyLawrence Liberti, Rian Marie Extavour, Prisha Patel, et al.
BMJ Open|November 28, 2019
To what degree are review outcomes aligned for new active substances (NASs) between the European Medicines Agency and the US Food and Drug Administration? A comparison based on publicly available information for NASs initially approved in the time period 2014 to 2016Thomas Christian Kühler, Magda Bujar, Neil McAuslane, et al.
Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science|September 21, 2018
An Analysis of Regulatory Timing and Outcomes for New Drug Applications Submitted to Swissmedic: Comparison With the US Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines AgencyPetra Dörr, Alison Wadworth, Tina Wang, et al.
Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science|February 3, 2020
A Proposed Framework for a Globally Applicable Pragmatic Approach to Using Facilitated Regulatory PathwaysLawrence Liberti, Neil McAuslane, Pieter Stolk, et al.
Value in Health : the Journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research|June 19, 2018
Building Synergy between Regulatory and HTA Agencies beyond Processes and Procedures-Can We Effectively Align the Evidentiary Requirements? A Survey of Stakeholder PerceptionsTing Wang, Neil McAuslane, Lawrence Liberti, et al.
Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science|September 18, 2018
A Universal Framework for the Benefit-Risk Assessment of Medicines: Is This the Way Forward?Stuart Walker, Neil McAuslane, Lawrence Liberti, et al.
Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science|July 4, 2020
Use of the Certificate for Pharmaceutical Products (CPP) in 18 Maturing Pharmaceutical Markets: Comparing Agency Guidelines with Company PracticeCéline Rodier, Magda Bujar, Neil McAuslane, et al.
Clinical Therapeutics|April 22, 2021
Transparency in European Medicines Agency and US Food and Drug Administration Decision Making: Is It Possible to Identify the Rationale for Divergences in Approved Indication From Public Assessment Reports?Magda Bujar, Sara Ferragu, Neil McAuslane, et al.
Frontiers in Pharmacology|January 4, 2021
Companies' Health Technology Assessment Strategies and Practices in Australia, Canada, England, France, Germany, Italy and Spain: An Industry Metrics StudyTing Wang, Neil McAuslane, Lawrence Liberti, et al.
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care|September 8, 2020
Benchmarking health technology assessment agencies-methodological challenges and recommendationsTing Wang, Iga Lipska, Neil McAuslane, et al.
Pageof 3