Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Filters

Lisa Hinton

Showing results (91-100 of 108) with videos related to

Pageof 11
Sort By:
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth|November 28, 2024
Self-monitoring blood pressure in pregnancy: evaluation of women's experiences of the BUMP trialsAlison Chisholm, Katherine L Tucker, Carole Crawford, et al.
Pregnancy Hypertension|February 1, 2024
Self-monitoring blood pressure in Pregnancy: Evaluation of health professional experiences of the BUMP trialsAlison Chisholm, Katherine L Tucker, Carole Crawford, et al.
BMJ Open|February 3, 2025
Developing a core outcome set for assessing interventions and care for parents after neonatal death in high-income countries (iCHOOSE Neonatal study): protocol for a mixed-methods studyAnna Davies, Charlotte Williams, Christy Burden, et al.
Pregnancy Hypertension|December 16, 2017
The feasibility and acceptability of self-testing for proteinuria during pregnancy: A mixed methods approachKatherine L Tucker, Liza Bowen, Carole Crawford, et al.
Pregnancy Hypertension|May 7, 2019
Corrigendum to "The feasibility and acceptability of self-testing for proteinuria during pregnancy: A mixed methods approach" [Pregn. Hypertens. 12 (2018) 161-168]Katherine L Tucker, Liza Bowen, Carole Crawford, et al.
BMJ Open|August 23, 2019
Family satisfaction with critical care in the UK: a multicentre cohort studyPaloma Ferrando, Doug W Gould, Emma Walmsley, et al.
Social Science & Medicine (1982)|October 22, 2022
Benefits and harms adopted by health economic assessments evaluating antenatal and newborn screening programmes in OECD countries: A systematic review of 336 articles and reportsMay Ee Png, Miaoqing Yang, Sian Taylor-Phillips, et al.
Health Technology Assessment (Winchester, England)|June 28, 2024
Benefits and harms of antenatal and newborn screening programmes in health economic assessments: the VALENTIA systematic review and qualitative investigationOliver Rivero-Arias, May Ee Png, Ashley White, et al.
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth|December 30, 2017
Blood pressure self-monitoring in pregnancy: examining feasibility in a prospective cohort studyKatherine L Tucker, Kathryn S Taylor, Carole Crawford, et al.
BMJ Quality & Safety|December 21, 2023
How to co-design a prototype of a clinical practice tool: a framework with practical guidance and a case studyMatthew Woodward, Mary Dixon-Woods, Wendy Randall, et al.
Pageof 11

Showing results (91-100 of 108) with videos related to

Sort By:
Pageof 11
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth|November 28, 2024
Self-monitoring blood pressure in pregnancy: evaluation of women's experiences of the BUMP trialsAlison Chisholm, Katherine L Tucker, Carole Crawford, et al.
Pregnancy Hypertension|February 1, 2024
Self-monitoring blood pressure in Pregnancy: Evaluation of health professional experiences of the BUMP trialsAlison Chisholm, Katherine L Tucker, Carole Crawford, et al.
BMJ Open|February 3, 2025
Developing a core outcome set for assessing interventions and care for parents after neonatal death in high-income countries (iCHOOSE Neonatal study): protocol for a mixed-methods studyAnna Davies, Charlotte Williams, Christy Burden, et al.
Pregnancy Hypertension|December 16, 2017
The feasibility and acceptability of self-testing for proteinuria during pregnancy: A mixed methods approachKatherine L Tucker, Liza Bowen, Carole Crawford, et al.
Pregnancy Hypertension|May 7, 2019
Corrigendum to "The feasibility and acceptability of self-testing for proteinuria during pregnancy: A mixed methods approach" [Pregn. Hypertens. 12 (2018) 161-168]Katherine L Tucker, Liza Bowen, Carole Crawford, et al.
BMJ Open|August 23, 2019
Family satisfaction with critical care in the UK: a multicentre cohort studyPaloma Ferrando, Doug W Gould, Emma Walmsley, et al.
Social Science & Medicine (1982)|October 22, 2022
Benefits and harms adopted by health economic assessments evaluating antenatal and newborn screening programmes in OECD countries: A systematic review of 336 articles and reportsMay Ee Png, Miaoqing Yang, Sian Taylor-Phillips, et al.
Health Technology Assessment (Winchester, England)|June 28, 2024
Benefits and harms of antenatal and newborn screening programmes in health economic assessments: the VALENTIA systematic review and qualitative investigationOliver Rivero-Arias, May Ee Png, Ashley White, et al.
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth|December 30, 2017
Blood pressure self-monitoring in pregnancy: examining feasibility in a prospective cohort studyKatherine L Tucker, Kathryn S Taylor, Carole Crawford, et al.
BMJ Quality & Safety|December 21, 2023
How to co-design a prototype of a clinical practice tool: a framework with practical guidance and a case studyMatthew Woodward, Mary Dixon-Woods, Wendy Randall, et al.
Pageof 11