Search research articles
Contact Us
Filters
Showing results (1-10 of 19) with videos related to
Page
of 2
Sort By:
Journal of Medical Imaging (Bellingham, Wash.)
|
May 26, 2018
Cognitive processing differences of experts and novices when correlating anatomy and cross-sectional imaging
Lonie R Salkowski, Rosemary Russ
Radiology
|
November 17, 2010
Utility of 6-month follow-up imaging after a concordant benign breast biopsy result
Lonie R Salkowski, Amy M Fowler, Elizabeth S Burnside, et al.
Radiology Case Reports
|
June 16, 2016
Unresected Breast Cancer: Evolution of Imaging Findings Following Cryoablation
Jennifer T Bergin, Gale A Sisney, Fred T Lee, et al.
Radiology
|
December 24, 2010
The mammographic density of a mass is a significant predictor of breast cancer
Ryan W Woods, Gale S Sisney, Lonie R Salkowski, et al.
Journal of Medical Imaging (Bellingham, Wash.)
|
January 4, 2019
Comparison of screening full-field digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis technical recalls
Lonie R Salkowski, Mai Elezaby, Amy M Fowler, et al.
Clinical Imaging
|
December 22, 2019
Image-based screening for men at high risk for breast cancer: Benefits and drawbacks
Ryan W Woods, Lonie R Salkowski, Mai Elezaby, et al.
Journal of Medical Imaging (Bellingham, Wash.)
|
February 3, 2018
Review of quantitative multiscale imaging of breast cancer
Michael A Pinkert, Lonie R Salkowski, Patricia J Keely, et al.
IEEE Transactions on Bio-Medical Engineering
|
March 11, 2009
Fluorescence spectroscopy: an adjunct diagnostic tool to image-guided core needle biopsy of the breast
Changfang Zhu, Elizabeth S Burnside, Gale A Sisney, et al.
AJR. American Journal of Roentgenology
|
August 10, 2017
Utility of BI-RADS Assessment Category 4 Subdivisions for Screening Breast MRI
Roberta M Strigel, Elizabeth S Burnside, Mai Elezaby, et al.
Radiology
|
January 27, 2007
Use of microcalcification descriptors in BI-RADS 4th edition to stratify risk of malignancy
Elizabeth S Burnside, Jennifer E Ochsner, Kathryn J Fowler, et al.
Page
of 2
Search research articles
Search
Showing results (1-10 of 19) with videos related to
Sort By:
Page
of 2
Journal of Medical Imaging (Bellingham, Wash.)
|
May 26, 2018
Cognitive processing differences of experts and novices when correlating anatomy and cross-sectional imaging
Lonie R Salkowski, Rosemary Russ
Radiology
|
November 17, 2010
Utility of 6-month follow-up imaging after a concordant benign breast biopsy result
Lonie R Salkowski, Amy M Fowler, Elizabeth S Burnside, et al.
Radiology Case Reports
|
June 16, 2016
Unresected Breast Cancer: Evolution of Imaging Findings Following Cryoablation
Jennifer T Bergin, Gale A Sisney, Fred T Lee, et al.
Radiology
|
December 24, 2010
The mammographic density of a mass is a significant predictor of breast cancer
Ryan W Woods, Gale S Sisney, Lonie R Salkowski, et al.
Journal of Medical Imaging (Bellingham, Wash.)
|
January 4, 2019
Comparison of screening full-field digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis technical recalls
Lonie R Salkowski, Mai Elezaby, Amy M Fowler, et al.
Clinical Imaging
|
December 22, 2019
Image-based screening for men at high risk for breast cancer: Benefits and drawbacks
Ryan W Woods, Lonie R Salkowski, Mai Elezaby, et al.
Journal of Medical Imaging (Bellingham, Wash.)
|
February 3, 2018
Review of quantitative multiscale imaging of breast cancer
Michael A Pinkert, Lonie R Salkowski, Patricia J Keely, et al.
IEEE Transactions on Bio-Medical Engineering
|
March 11, 2009
Fluorescence spectroscopy: an adjunct diagnostic tool to image-guided core needle biopsy of the breast
Changfang Zhu, Elizabeth S Burnside, Gale A Sisney, et al.
AJR. American Journal of Roentgenology
|
August 10, 2017
Utility of BI-RADS Assessment Category 4 Subdivisions for Screening Breast MRI
Roberta M Strigel, Elizabeth S Burnside, Mai Elezaby, et al.
Radiology
|
January 27, 2007
Use of microcalcification descriptors in BI-RADS 4th edition to stratify risk of malignancy
Elizabeth S Burnside, Jennifer E Ochsner, Kathryn J Fowler, et al.
Page
of 2