Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Filters

Loretta M Kopelman

Showing results (1-10 of 36) with videos related to

Pageof 4
Sort By:
Second Opinion (Park Ridge, Ill.)|October 1, 1994
Female circumcision/genital mutilation and ethical relativismLoretta M Kopelman
The American Journal of Bioethics : AJOB|March 24, 2004
Adolescents as doubly-vulnerable research subjectsLoretta M Kopelman
The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics : a Journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics|March 22, 2002
Pediatric research regulations under legal scrutiny: Grimes narrows their interpretationLoretta M Kopelman
The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics : a Journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics|April 6, 2005
What conditions justify risky nontherapeutic or "no benefit" pediatric studies: a sliding scale analysisLoretta M Kopelman
The American Journal of Bioethics : AJOB|February 28, 2006
What is unique about the doctor and patient medical encounter? A moral and economic perspectiveLoretta M Kopelman
The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy|December 13, 2006
Bioethics as a second-order discipline: who is not a bioethicist?Loretta M Kopelman
The Virtual Mentor : VM|December 25, 2012
On distinguishing justifiable from unjustifiable paternalismLoretta M Kopelman
The American Journal of Bioethics : AJOB|August 16, 2014
Using the minimal risk threshold for all "no-benefit" pediatric studiesLoretta M Kopelman
Accountability in Research|June 21, 2003
Group benefit and protection of pediatric research subjects: Grimes v. Kennedy Krieger and the Lead Abatement StudyLoretta M Kopelman
The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy|December 24, 2013
Make her a virgin again: when medical disputes about minors are cultural clashesLoretta M Kopelman
Pageof 4

Showing results (1-10 of 36) with videos related to

Sort By:
Pageof 4
Second Opinion (Park Ridge, Ill.)|October 1, 1994
Female circumcision/genital mutilation and ethical relativismLoretta M Kopelman
The American Journal of Bioethics : AJOB|March 24, 2004
Adolescents as doubly-vulnerable research subjectsLoretta M Kopelman
The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics : a Journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics|March 22, 2002
Pediatric research regulations under legal scrutiny: Grimes narrows their interpretationLoretta M Kopelman
The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics : a Journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics|April 6, 2005
What conditions justify risky nontherapeutic or "no benefit" pediatric studies: a sliding scale analysisLoretta M Kopelman
The American Journal of Bioethics : AJOB|February 28, 2006
What is unique about the doctor and patient medical encounter? A moral and economic perspectiveLoretta M Kopelman
The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy|December 13, 2006
Bioethics as a second-order discipline: who is not a bioethicist?Loretta M Kopelman
The Virtual Mentor : VM|December 25, 2012
On distinguishing justifiable from unjustifiable paternalismLoretta M Kopelman
The American Journal of Bioethics : AJOB|August 16, 2014
Using the minimal risk threshold for all "no-benefit" pediatric studiesLoretta M Kopelman
Accountability in Research|June 21, 2003
Group benefit and protection of pediatric research subjects: Grimes v. Kennedy Krieger and the Lead Abatement StudyLoretta M Kopelman
The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy|December 24, 2013
Make her a virgin again: when medical disputes about minors are cultural clashesLoretta M Kopelman
Pageof 4