Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Filters

Lutz Bornmann

Showing results (11-20 of 74) with videos related to

Pageof 8
Sort By:
Scientometrics|May 3, 2021
Can tweets be used to detect problems early with scientific papers? A case study of three retracted COVID-19/SARS-CoV-2 papersRobin Haunschild, Lutz Bornmann
Scientometrics|May 31, 2016
How to normalize Twitter counts? A first attempt based on journals in the Twitter IndexLutz Bornmann, Robin Haunschild
EMBO Reports|November 15, 2018
Alternative article-level metrics: The use of alternative metrics in research evaluationLutz Bornmann, Robin Haunschild
Plos One|February 19, 2013
Macro-indicators of citation impacts of six prolific countries: InCites data and the statistical significance of trendsLutz Bornmann, Loet Leydesdorff
Scientometrics|April 10, 2018
Count highly-cited papers instead of papers with <i>h</i> citations: use normalized citation counts and compare "like with like"!Lutz Bornmann, Loet Leydesdorff
EMBO Reports|January 22, 2015
Response to Stephen HolgateLutz Bornmann, Loet Leydesdorff
Plos One|August 6, 2025
Correction: Do altmetrics correlate with the quality of papers? A large-scale empirical study based on F1000Prime dataLutz Bornmann, Robin Haunschild
Plos One|November 1, 2023
Are quality assessments in science affected by anchoring effects? The proposal of a follow-up studyLutz Bornmann, Christian Ganser
Plos One|May 24, 2018
Do altmetrics correlate with the quality of papers? A large-scale empirical study based on F1000Prime dataLutz Bornmann, Robin Haunschild
Journal of Korean Medical Science|May 2, 2018
Measuring Individual Performance with Comprehensive Bibliometric Reports as an Alternative to <i>h</i>-Index ValuesLutz Bornmann, Robin Haunschild
Pageof 8

Showing results (11-20 of 74) with videos related to

Sort By:
Pageof 8
Scientometrics|May 3, 2021
Can tweets be used to detect problems early with scientific papers? A case study of three retracted COVID-19/SARS-CoV-2 papersRobin Haunschild, Lutz Bornmann
Scientometrics|May 31, 2016
How to normalize Twitter counts? A first attempt based on journals in the Twitter IndexLutz Bornmann, Robin Haunschild
EMBO Reports|November 15, 2018
Alternative article-level metrics: The use of alternative metrics in research evaluationLutz Bornmann, Robin Haunschild
Plos One|February 19, 2013
Macro-indicators of citation impacts of six prolific countries: InCites data and the statistical significance of trendsLutz Bornmann, Loet Leydesdorff
Scientometrics|April 10, 2018
Count highly-cited papers instead of papers with <i>h</i> citations: use normalized citation counts and compare "like with like"!Lutz Bornmann, Loet Leydesdorff
EMBO Reports|January 22, 2015
Response to Stephen HolgateLutz Bornmann, Loet Leydesdorff
Plos One|August 6, 2025
Correction: Do altmetrics correlate with the quality of papers? A large-scale empirical study based on F1000Prime dataLutz Bornmann, Robin Haunschild
Plos One|November 1, 2023
Are quality assessments in science affected by anchoring effects? The proposal of a follow-up studyLutz Bornmann, Christian Ganser
Plos One|May 24, 2018
Do altmetrics correlate with the quality of papers? A large-scale empirical study based on F1000Prime dataLutz Bornmann, Robin Haunschild
Journal of Korean Medical Science|May 2, 2018
Measuring Individual Performance with Comprehensive Bibliometric Reports as an Alternative to <i>h</i>-Index ValuesLutz Bornmann, Robin Haunschild
Pageof 8