Showing results (181-190 of 235) with videos related to
Sort By:
Pageof 24
BMC Health Services Research|April 7, 2016
Effectiveness, cost effectiveness, acceptability and implementation barriers/enablers of chronic kidney disease management programs for Indigenous people in Australia, New Zealand and Canada: a systematic review of mixed evidenceRachel Reilly, Katharine Evans, Judith Gomersall, et al.Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics|October 29, 2021
Practical guide to undertaking scoping reviews for pharmacy clinicians, researchers and policymakersHanan Khalil, Patricia McInerney, Danielle Pollock, et al.Nature Genetics|May 1, 1997
Pseudoautosomal deletions encompassing a novel homeobox gene cause growth failure in idiopathic short stature and Turner syndromeE Rao, B Weiss, M Fukami, et al.Prenatal Diagnosis|July 23, 1999
First-trimester diagnosis of infantile neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis (INCL) using PPT enzyme assay and CLN1 mutation analysisB B de Vries, W J Kleijer, J L Keulemans, et al.JBI Evidence Synthesis|February 1, 2022
Best practice guidance and reporting items for the development of scoping review protocolsMicah D J Peters, Christina Godfrey, Patricia McInerney, et al.Protein Expression and Purification|April 1, 1991
Expression and purification of active recombinant platelet factor 4 from a cleavable fusion proteinJ A Myers, G S Gray, D J Peters, et al.European Journal of Paediatric Neurology : EJPN : Official Journal of the European Paediatric Neurology Society|October 9, 2001
New mutations in the neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis genesS E Mole, N A Zhong, A Sarpong, et al.Human Mutation|January 1, 1997
Deletions spanning the neurofibromatosis type 1 gene: implications for genotype-phenotype correlations in neurofibromatosis type 1?M H Cnossen, M N van der Est, M H Breuning, et al.JBI Evidence Synthesis|October 10, 2020
Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviewsMicah D J Peters, Casey Marnie, Andrea C Tricco, et al.JBI Evidence Implementation|February 11, 2021
Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviewsMicah D J Peters, Casey Marnie, Andrea C Tricco, et al.Pageof 24