Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Filters

M J Michell

Showing results (31-40 of 38) with videos related to

Pageof 4
Sort By:
You have reached the last page of results.This site can display upto 38 results.
The British Journal of Radiology|February 1, 1995
Classification of ductal carcinoma in situ by image analysis of calcifications from digital mammogramsJ Parker, D R Dance, D H Davies, et al.
Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland)|February 21, 2006
The impact of image guided needle biopsy on the outcome of mammographically detected indeterminate microcalcificationM A Al-Attar, M J Michell, G Ralleigh, et al.
Clinical Radiology|May 6, 2009
The Royal College of Radiologists Breast Group breast imaging classificationA J Maxwell, N T Ridley, G Rubin, et al.
Clinical Radiology|December 24, 2008
Prediction of the presence of invasive disease from the measurement of extent of malignant microcalcification on mammography and ductal carcinoma in situ grade at core biopsyE A M O'Flynn, J C Morel, J Gonzalez, et al.
Clinical Radiology|August 8, 2014
The accuracy of digital breast tomosynthesis compared with coned compression magnification mammography in the assessment of abnormalities found on mammographyJ C Morel, A Iqbal, R K Wasan, et al.
Clinical Radiology|May 26, 2012
A comparison of the accuracy of film-screen mammography, full-field digital mammography, and digital breast tomosynthesisM J Michell, A Iqbal, R K Wasan, et al.
Clinical Radiology|May 13, 2019
An audit of mammographic screen detected lesions of uncertain malignant potential (B3) diagnosed on initial image guided needle biopsy: how has our practice changed over 10 years?B Batohi, C Fang, M J Michell, et al.
Clinical Radiology|February 13, 2019
Can digital breast tomosynthesis accurately predict whether circumscribed masses are benign or malignant in a screening population?R K Wasan, J C Morel, A Iqbal, et al.
Pageof 4

Showing results (31-40 of 38) with videos related to

Sort By:
Pageof 4
You have reached the last page of results.This site can display upto 38 results.
The British Journal of Radiology|February 1, 1995
Classification of ductal carcinoma in situ by image analysis of calcifications from digital mammogramsJ Parker, D R Dance, D H Davies, et al.
Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland)|February 21, 2006
The impact of image guided needle biopsy on the outcome of mammographically detected indeterminate microcalcificationM A Al-Attar, M J Michell, G Ralleigh, et al.
Clinical Radiology|May 6, 2009
The Royal College of Radiologists Breast Group breast imaging classificationA J Maxwell, N T Ridley, G Rubin, et al.
Clinical Radiology|December 24, 2008
Prediction of the presence of invasive disease from the measurement of extent of malignant microcalcification on mammography and ductal carcinoma in situ grade at core biopsyE A M O'Flynn, J C Morel, J Gonzalez, et al.
Clinical Radiology|August 8, 2014
The accuracy of digital breast tomosynthesis compared with coned compression magnification mammography in the assessment of abnormalities found on mammographyJ C Morel, A Iqbal, R K Wasan, et al.
Clinical Radiology|May 26, 2012
A comparison of the accuracy of film-screen mammography, full-field digital mammography, and digital breast tomosynthesisM J Michell, A Iqbal, R K Wasan, et al.
Clinical Radiology|May 13, 2019
An audit of mammographic screen detected lesions of uncertain malignant potential (B3) diagnosed on initial image guided needle biopsy: how has our practice changed over 10 years?B Batohi, C Fang, M J Michell, et al.
Clinical Radiology|February 13, 2019
Can digital breast tomosynthesis accurately predict whether circumscribed masses are benign or malignant in a screening population?R K Wasan, J C Morel, A Iqbal, et al.
Pageof 4