Showing results (81-90 of 2,223) with videos related to
Sort By:
Pageof 223
Perspectives in Public Health|August 6, 2013
Symptom attribution and risk perception in individuals with idiopathic environmental intolerance to electromagnetic fields and in the general populationDiana van Dongen, Tjabe Smid, Daniëlle R M TimmermansBMC Public Health|November 1, 2018
Why are the public so positive about colorectal cancer screening?Linda N Douma, Ellen Uiters, Danielle R M TimmermansBMC Medical Ethics|October 26, 2023
Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT): is routinization problematic?Christoph Rehmann-Sutter, Daniëlle R M Timmermans, Aviad RazRoux'S Archives of Developmental Biology : the Official Organ of the EDBO|March 18, 2017
Mesoderm differentiation in explants of carp embryosValentina Bozhkova, Geertruy Te Kronnie, Lucy P M TimmermansBMC Public Health|December 1, 2016
The Dutch public are positive about the colorectal cancer-screening programme, but is this a well-informed opinion?Linda N Douma, Ellen Uiters, Danielle R M TimmermansPlos One|March 1, 2019
Do people with a different goal-orientation or specific focus make different decisions about colorectal cancer-screening participation?Linda N Douma, Ellen Uiters, Danielle R M TimmermansBMC Psychology|February 5, 2020
Decision-making styles in the context of colorectal cancer screeningLinda N Douma, Ellen Uiters, Danielle R M TimmermansMidwifery|November 15, 2011
Parental duties and prenatal screening: does an offer of prenatal screening lead women to believe that they are morally compelled to test?Elisa García, Danielle R M Timmermans, Evert van LeeuwenPrenatal Diagnosis|January 11, 2008
Rethinking autonomy in the context of prenatal screening decision-makingElisa García, Danielle R M Timmermans, Evert van LeeuwenPatient Education and Counseling|June 28, 2008
Clinical geneticists' and genetic counselors' views on the communication of genetic risks: a qualitative studyLidewij Henneman, Theresa M Marteau, Danielle R M TimmermansPageof 223