Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Filters

Mads P Sørensen

Showing results (1-10 of 10) with videos related to

Pageof 1
Sort By:
Science and Engineering Ethics|June 17, 2021
Exploring the Gray Area: Similarities and Differences in Questionable Research Practices (QRPs) Across Main Areas of ResearchTine Ravn, Mads P Sørensen
Public Understanding of Science (Bristol, England)|August 29, 2015
How to take non-knowledge seriously, or "the unexpected virtue of ignorance"Kristian H Nielsen, Mads P Sørensen
Science and Engineering Ethics|February 27, 2026
Time, Quality, and Integrity: Temporal Autonomy as a Missing Link in Research Assessment ReformMads P Sørensen, Marina Lambert, Tine Ravn, et al.
Accountability in Research|June 4, 2026
Shared responsibility to address questionable research practices? - A study of perceived efficacy of organizational research integrity policiesSimon Fuglsang, Serge P J M Horbach, Mads P Sørensen, et al.
Evaluation and Program Planning|January 15, 2014
Developing a methodology to assess the impact of research grant funding: a mixed methods approachCarter Bloch, Mads P Sørensen, Ebbe K Graversen, et al.
Stem Cell Reports|March 31, 2023
Public perceptions and expectations: Disentangling the hope and hype of organoid researchTine Ravn, Mads P Sørensen, Emma Capulli, et al.
European Journal of Applied Physiology|July 21, 2021
Freely chosen cadence during ergometer cycling is dependent on pedalling historyErnst A Hansen, Emma Nøddelund, Frederikke S Nielsen, et al.
Science and Engineering Ethics|January 12, 2026
Convergences and Gaps between Environmental Ethics, Climate Ethics, and Research Ethics: A Scoping ReviewMichel Bourban, Dominic Lenzi, Mads P Sørensen, et al.
Nature|October 12, 2020
Research integrity: nine ways to move from talk to walkNiels Mejlgaard, Lex M Bouter, George Gaskell, et al.
Plos Biology|August 19, 2022
Designing and implementing a research integrity promotion plan: Recommendations for research fundersSerge P J M Horbach, Lex M Bouter, George Gaskell, et al.
Pageof 1

Showing results (1-10 of 10) with videos related to

Sort By:
Pageof 1
Science and Engineering Ethics|June 17, 2021
Exploring the Gray Area: Similarities and Differences in Questionable Research Practices (QRPs) Across Main Areas of ResearchTine Ravn, Mads P Sørensen
Public Understanding of Science (Bristol, England)|August 29, 2015
How to take non-knowledge seriously, or "the unexpected virtue of ignorance"Kristian H Nielsen, Mads P Sørensen
Science and Engineering Ethics|February 27, 2026
Time, Quality, and Integrity: Temporal Autonomy as a Missing Link in Research Assessment ReformMads P Sørensen, Marina Lambert, Tine Ravn, et al.
Accountability in Research|June 4, 2026
Shared responsibility to address questionable research practices? - A study of perceived efficacy of organizational research integrity policiesSimon Fuglsang, Serge P J M Horbach, Mads P Sørensen, et al.
Evaluation and Program Planning|January 15, 2014
Developing a methodology to assess the impact of research grant funding: a mixed methods approachCarter Bloch, Mads P Sørensen, Ebbe K Graversen, et al.
Stem Cell Reports|March 31, 2023
Public perceptions and expectations: Disentangling the hope and hype of organoid researchTine Ravn, Mads P Sørensen, Emma Capulli, et al.
European Journal of Applied Physiology|July 21, 2021
Freely chosen cadence during ergometer cycling is dependent on pedalling historyErnst A Hansen, Emma Nøddelund, Frederikke S Nielsen, et al.
Science and Engineering Ethics|January 12, 2026
Convergences and Gaps between Environmental Ethics, Climate Ethics, and Research Ethics: A Scoping ReviewMichel Bourban, Dominic Lenzi, Mads P Sørensen, et al.
Nature|October 12, 2020
Research integrity: nine ways to move from talk to walkNiels Mejlgaard, Lex M Bouter, George Gaskell, et al.
Plos Biology|August 19, 2022
Designing and implementing a research integrity promotion plan: Recommendations for research fundersSerge P J M Horbach, Lex M Bouter, George Gaskell, et al.
Pageof 1