Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Filters

Malcolm Macleod

Showing results (41-50 of 98) with videos related to

Pageof 10
Sort By:
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America|April 24, 2021
The MDAR (Materials Design Analysis Reporting) Framework for transparent reporting in the life sciencesMalcolm Macleod, Andrew M Collings, Chris Graf, et al.
BMC Research Notes|December 21, 2021
Improving research quality: the view from the UK Reproducibility Network institutional leads for research improvementAndrew J Stewart, Emily K Farran, James A Grange, et al.
Intensive Care Medicine Experimental|January 19, 2020
Meta-analysis of targeted temperature management in animal models of cardiac arrestHilmer Olai, Gustav Thornéus, Hannah Watson, et al.
Journal of Translational Medicine|December 10, 2020
Can harmonisation of outcomes bridge the translation gap for pre-clinical research? A systematic review of outcomes measured in mouse models of type 2 diabetesNicola L Harman, Adrián Sanz-Moreno, Stamatia Papoutsopoulou, et al.
Lancet (London, England)|January 14, 2014
Increasing value and reducing waste in biomedical research regulation and managementRustam Al-Shahi Salman, Elaine Beller, Jonathan Kagan, et al.
Stroke|February 2, 2008
Empirical evidence of bias in the design of experimental stroke studies: a metaepidemiologic approachNicolas A Crossley, Emily Sena, Jos Goehler, et al.
Clinical Science (London, England : 1979)|January 11, 2023
Screening for in vitro systematic reviews: a comparison of screening methods and training of a machine learning classifierEmma Wilson, Florenz Cruz, Duncan Maclean, et al.
Neuroscience Applied|July 14, 2025
Testing the usefulness of a quality system in preclinical researchRené Bernard, Björn Gerlach, Magali Haas, et al.
Neurology|June 9, 2019
Outcome heterogeneity and bias in acute experimental spinal cord injury: A meta-analysisRalf Watzlawick, Ana Antonic, Emily S Sena, et al.
BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.)|December 19, 2006
Comparison of treatment effects between animal experiments and clinical trials: systematic reviewPablo Perel, Ian Roberts, Emily Sena, et al.
Pageof 10

Showing results (41-50 of 98) with videos related to

Sort By:
Pageof 10
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America|April 24, 2021
The MDAR (Materials Design Analysis Reporting) Framework for transparent reporting in the life sciencesMalcolm Macleod, Andrew M Collings, Chris Graf, et al.
BMC Research Notes|December 21, 2021
Improving research quality: the view from the UK Reproducibility Network institutional leads for research improvementAndrew J Stewart, Emily K Farran, James A Grange, et al.
Intensive Care Medicine Experimental|January 19, 2020
Meta-analysis of targeted temperature management in animal models of cardiac arrestHilmer Olai, Gustav Thornéus, Hannah Watson, et al.
Journal of Translational Medicine|December 10, 2020
Can harmonisation of outcomes bridge the translation gap for pre-clinical research? A systematic review of outcomes measured in mouse models of type 2 diabetesNicola L Harman, Adrián Sanz-Moreno, Stamatia Papoutsopoulou, et al.
Lancet (London, England)|January 14, 2014
Increasing value and reducing waste in biomedical research regulation and managementRustam Al-Shahi Salman, Elaine Beller, Jonathan Kagan, et al.
Stroke|February 2, 2008
Empirical evidence of bias in the design of experimental stroke studies: a metaepidemiologic approachNicolas A Crossley, Emily Sena, Jos Goehler, et al.
Clinical Science (London, England : 1979)|January 11, 2023
Screening for in vitro systematic reviews: a comparison of screening methods and training of a machine learning classifierEmma Wilson, Florenz Cruz, Duncan Maclean, et al.
Neuroscience Applied|July 14, 2025
Testing the usefulness of a quality system in preclinical researchRené Bernard, Björn Gerlach, Magali Haas, et al.
Neurology|June 9, 2019
Outcome heterogeneity and bias in acute experimental spinal cord injury: A meta-analysisRalf Watzlawick, Ana Antonic, Emily S Sena, et al.
BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.)|December 19, 2006
Comparison of treatment effects between animal experiments and clinical trials: systematic reviewPablo Perel, Ian Roberts, Emily Sena, et al.
Pageof 10