Search research articles
Contact Us
Filters
Showing results (51-60 of 125) with videos related to
Page
of 13
Sort By:
The Journal of Urology
|
September 18, 2020
A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Significance of Body Mass Index on Kidney Cancer Outcomes
Lawrence H Kim, Paul Doan, Yilu He, et al.
Investigative and Clinical Urology
|
September 11, 2019
A novel human cadaver model to investigate a retrourethral transobturator male sling procedure
Sean F Mungovan, William I Jaffe, Petra L Graham, et al.
Plos One
|
April 7, 2016
The Role of Personalised Choice in Decision Support: A Randomized Controlled Trial of an Online Decision Aid for Prostate Cancer Screening
Glenn Salkeld, Michelle Cunich, Jack Dowie, et al.
Supportive Care in Cancer : Official Journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer
|
April 29, 2017
A conceptual framework for patient-reported outcomes in non-muscle invasive bladder cancer
Claudia Rutherford, Daniel S J Costa, Madeleine T King, et al.
BJU International
|
August 10, 2021
A comparison of prostate cancer prediction models in men undergoing both magnetic resonance imaging and transperineal biopsy: Are the models still relevant?
Paul Doan, Petra Graham, John Lahoud, et al.
BJU International
|
December 4, 2024
Telehealth vs face-to-face consultations in a urological oncology clinic: a randomised controlled trial
David Armany, Athos Katelaris, Ankur Dhar, et al.
Patient Education and Counseling
|
February 14, 2024
eHealth literacy in prostate cancer: A systematic review
Stuart Robert Jackson, Paul Yu, David Armany, et al.
Digital Health
|
January 13, 2025
eHealth, digital information and technology use of men with prostate cancer
Stuart R Jackson, Paul Yu, Steven Sowter, et al.
Urology
|
May 9, 2003
Long-term follow-up of bilateral sporadic renal tumors
Manish I Patel, Rachel Simmons, Michael W Kattan, et al.
BMJ Open
|
January 10, 2012
The COMPASs Study: Community Preferences for Prostate cAncer Screening. Protocol for a quantitative preference study
Kirsten Howard, Glenn P Salkeld, Graham J Mann, et al.
Page
of 13
Search research articles
Search
Showing results (51-60 of 125) with videos related to
Sort By:
Page
of 13
The Journal of Urology
|
September 18, 2020
A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Significance of Body Mass Index on Kidney Cancer Outcomes
Lawrence H Kim, Paul Doan, Yilu He, et al.
Investigative and Clinical Urology
|
September 11, 2019
A novel human cadaver model to investigate a retrourethral transobturator male sling procedure
Sean F Mungovan, William I Jaffe, Petra L Graham, et al.
Plos One
|
April 7, 2016
The Role of Personalised Choice in Decision Support: A Randomized Controlled Trial of an Online Decision Aid for Prostate Cancer Screening
Glenn Salkeld, Michelle Cunich, Jack Dowie, et al.
Supportive Care in Cancer : Official Journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer
|
April 29, 2017
A conceptual framework for patient-reported outcomes in non-muscle invasive bladder cancer
Claudia Rutherford, Daniel S J Costa, Madeleine T King, et al.
BJU International
|
August 10, 2021
A comparison of prostate cancer prediction models in men undergoing both magnetic resonance imaging and transperineal biopsy: Are the models still relevant?
Paul Doan, Petra Graham, John Lahoud, et al.
BJU International
|
December 4, 2024
Telehealth vs face-to-face consultations in a urological oncology clinic: a randomised controlled trial
David Armany, Athos Katelaris, Ankur Dhar, et al.
Patient Education and Counseling
|
February 14, 2024
eHealth literacy in prostate cancer: A systematic review
Stuart Robert Jackson, Paul Yu, David Armany, et al.
Digital Health
|
January 13, 2025
eHealth, digital information and technology use of men with prostate cancer
Stuart R Jackson, Paul Yu, Steven Sowter, et al.
Urology
|
May 9, 2003
Long-term follow-up of bilateral sporadic renal tumors
Manish I Patel, Rachel Simmons, Michael W Kattan, et al.
BMJ Open
|
January 10, 2012
The COMPASs Study: Community Preferences for Prostate cAncer Screening. Protocol for a quantitative preference study
Kirsten Howard, Glenn P Salkeld, Graham J Mann, et al.
Page
of 13