Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Filters

Mark Oppe

Showing results (11-20 of 57) with videos related to

Pageof 6
Sort By:
Value in Health : the Journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research|September 10, 2010
Discrete choice modeling for the quantification of health states: the case of the EQ-5DElly A Stolk, Mark Oppe, Luciana Scalone, et al.
The Patient|February 16, 2022
Exploring the Comparability of Face-to-Face Versus Video Conference-Based Composite Time Trade-Off Interviews: Insights from EQ-5D-Y-3L Valuation Studies in Belgium and SpainAnabel Estévez-Carrillo, Sarah Dewilde, Mark Oppe, et al.
Value in Health : the Journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research|August 28, 2021
To What Extent Do Patient Preferences Differ From General Population Preferences?Kristina Ludwig, Juan M Ramos-Goñi, Mark Oppe, et al.
The European Journal of Health Economics : HEPAC : Health Economics in Prevention and Care|August 1, 2013
Introducing the composite time trade-off: a test of feasibility and face validityBas M F Janssen, Mark Oppe, Matthijs M Versteegh, et al.
The European Journal of Health Economics : HEPAC : Health Economics in Prevention and Care|April 5, 2013
Eliciting preferences to the EQ-5D-5L health states: discrete choice experiment or multiprofile case of best-worst scaling?Feng Xie, Eleanor Pullenayegum, Kathryn Gaebel, et al.
Pharmacoeconomics|April 17, 2016
EuroQol Protocols for Time Trade-Off Valuation of Health OutcomesMark Oppe, Kim Rand-Hendriksen, Koonal Shah, et al.
The Patient|March 15, 2025
How do Design Characteristics Affect Respondent Engagement? Assessing Attribute Non-attendance in Discrete Choice Experiments Valuing the EQ-5D-5LPeiwen Jiang, Deborah Street, Richard Norman, et al.
Value in Health : the Journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research|November 12, 2019
Toward a Smaller Design for EQ-5D-5L Valuation StudiesZhihao Yang, Nan Luo, Mark Oppe, et al.
Value in Health : the Journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research|May 2, 2022
Accounting for Unobservable Preference Heterogeneity and Evaluating Alternative Anchoring Approaches to Estimate Country-Specific EQ-5D-Y Value Sets: A Case Study Using Spanish Preference DataJuan M Ramos-Goñi, Mark Oppe, Anabel Estévez-Carrillo, et al.
Pharmacoeconomics|June 6, 2013
A choice that matters? Smulation study on the impact of direct meta-analysis methods on health economic outcomesPepijn Vemer, Maiwenn J Al, Mark Oppe, et al.
Pageof 6

Showing results (11-20 of 57) with videos related to

Sort By:
Pageof 6
Value in Health : the Journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research|September 10, 2010
Discrete choice modeling for the quantification of health states: the case of the EQ-5DElly A Stolk, Mark Oppe, Luciana Scalone, et al.
The Patient|February 16, 2022
Exploring the Comparability of Face-to-Face Versus Video Conference-Based Composite Time Trade-Off Interviews: Insights from EQ-5D-Y-3L Valuation Studies in Belgium and SpainAnabel Estévez-Carrillo, Sarah Dewilde, Mark Oppe, et al.
Value in Health : the Journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research|August 28, 2021
To What Extent Do Patient Preferences Differ From General Population Preferences?Kristina Ludwig, Juan M Ramos-Goñi, Mark Oppe, et al.
The European Journal of Health Economics : HEPAC : Health Economics in Prevention and Care|August 1, 2013
Introducing the composite time trade-off: a test of feasibility and face validityBas M F Janssen, Mark Oppe, Matthijs M Versteegh, et al.
The European Journal of Health Economics : HEPAC : Health Economics in Prevention and Care|April 5, 2013
Eliciting preferences to the EQ-5D-5L health states: discrete choice experiment or multiprofile case of best-worst scaling?Feng Xie, Eleanor Pullenayegum, Kathryn Gaebel, et al.
Pharmacoeconomics|April 17, 2016
EuroQol Protocols for Time Trade-Off Valuation of Health OutcomesMark Oppe, Kim Rand-Hendriksen, Koonal Shah, et al.
The Patient|March 15, 2025
How do Design Characteristics Affect Respondent Engagement? Assessing Attribute Non-attendance in Discrete Choice Experiments Valuing the EQ-5D-5LPeiwen Jiang, Deborah Street, Richard Norman, et al.
Value in Health : the Journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research|November 12, 2019
Toward a Smaller Design for EQ-5D-5L Valuation StudiesZhihao Yang, Nan Luo, Mark Oppe, et al.
Value in Health : the Journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research|May 2, 2022
Accounting for Unobservable Preference Heterogeneity and Evaluating Alternative Anchoring Approaches to Estimate Country-Specific EQ-5D-Y Value Sets: A Case Study Using Spanish Preference DataJuan M Ramos-Goñi, Mark Oppe, Anabel Estévez-Carrillo, et al.
Pharmacoeconomics|June 6, 2013
A choice that matters? Smulation study on the impact of direct meta-analysis methods on health economic outcomesPepijn Vemer, Maiwenn J Al, Mark Oppe, et al.
Pageof 6