Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Filters

Martin J Yaffe

Showing results (151-160 of 176) with videos related to

Pageof 18
Sort By:
AJR. American Journal of Roentgenology|August 24, 2012
Assessing the stand-alone sensitivity of computer-aided detection with cancer cases from the Digital Mammographic Imaging Screening TrialElodia B Cole, Zheng Zhang, Helga S Marques, et al.
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention : a Publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, Cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology|July 13, 2017
Age at Menarche and Late Adolescent Adiposity Associated with Mammographic Density on Processed Digital Mammograms in 24,840 WomenStacey E Alexeeff, Nnaemeka U Odo, Jafi A Lipson, et al.
Cancers|November 26, 2020
Breast Cancer Mortality among Women with a <i>BRCA1</i> or <i>BRCA2</i> Mutation in a Magnetic Resonance Imaging Plus Mammography Screening ProgramEllen Warner, Siqi Zhu, Donald B Plewes, et al.
Radiology|June 18, 2005
American College of Radiology Imaging Network digital mammographic imaging screening trial: objectives and methodologyEtta D Pisano, Constantine A Gatsonis, Martin J Yaffe, et al.
JAMA|September 16, 2004
Surveillance of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers with magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, mammography, and clinical breast examinationEllen Warner, Donald B Plewes, Kimberley A Hill, et al.
American Journal of Epidemiology|March 14, 2019
Reproductive Factors and Mammographic Density: Associations Among 24,840 Women and Comparison of Studies Using Digitized Film-Screen Mammography and Full-Field Digital MammographyStacey E Alexeeff, Nnaemeka U Odo, Russell McBride, et al.
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention : a Publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, Cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology|March 25, 2010
Mammographic density change with 1 year of aerobic exercise among postmenopausal women: a randomized controlled trialChristy G Woolcott, Kerry S Courneya, Norman F Boyd, et al.
Medical Physics|August 2, 2006
Quality control for digital mammography: part II. Recommendations from the ACRIN DMIST trialMartin J Yaffe, Aili K Bloomquist, Gordon E Mawdsley, et al.
Medical Physics|July 25, 2008
Optimization of exposure parameters in full field digital mammographyMark B Williams, Priya Raghunathan, Mitali J More, et al.
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention : a Publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, Cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology|December 10, 2008
Predictors of mammographic density: insights gained from a novel regression analysis of a twin studyGillian S Dite, Lyle C Gurrin, Graham B Byrnes, et al.
Pageof 18

Showing results (151-160 of 176) with videos related to

Sort By:
Pageof 18
AJR. American Journal of Roentgenology|August 24, 2012
Assessing the stand-alone sensitivity of computer-aided detection with cancer cases from the Digital Mammographic Imaging Screening TrialElodia B Cole, Zheng Zhang, Helga S Marques, et al.
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention : a Publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, Cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology|July 13, 2017
Age at Menarche and Late Adolescent Adiposity Associated with Mammographic Density on Processed Digital Mammograms in 24,840 WomenStacey E Alexeeff, Nnaemeka U Odo, Jafi A Lipson, et al.
Cancers|November 26, 2020
Breast Cancer Mortality among Women with a <i>BRCA1</i> or <i>BRCA2</i> Mutation in a Magnetic Resonance Imaging Plus Mammography Screening ProgramEllen Warner, Siqi Zhu, Donald B Plewes, et al.
Radiology|June 18, 2005
American College of Radiology Imaging Network digital mammographic imaging screening trial: objectives and methodologyEtta D Pisano, Constantine A Gatsonis, Martin J Yaffe, et al.
JAMA|September 16, 2004
Surveillance of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers with magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, mammography, and clinical breast examinationEllen Warner, Donald B Plewes, Kimberley A Hill, et al.
American Journal of Epidemiology|March 14, 2019
Reproductive Factors and Mammographic Density: Associations Among 24,840 Women and Comparison of Studies Using Digitized Film-Screen Mammography and Full-Field Digital MammographyStacey E Alexeeff, Nnaemeka U Odo, Russell McBride, et al.
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention : a Publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, Cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology|March 25, 2010
Mammographic density change with 1 year of aerobic exercise among postmenopausal women: a randomized controlled trialChristy G Woolcott, Kerry S Courneya, Norman F Boyd, et al.
Medical Physics|August 2, 2006
Quality control for digital mammography: part II. Recommendations from the ACRIN DMIST trialMartin J Yaffe, Aili K Bloomquist, Gordon E Mawdsley, et al.
Medical Physics|July 25, 2008
Optimization of exposure parameters in full field digital mammographyMark B Williams, Priya Raghunathan, Mitali J More, et al.
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention : a Publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, Cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology|December 10, 2008
Predictors of mammographic density: insights gained from a novel regression analysis of a twin studyGillian S Dite, Lyle C Gurrin, Graham B Byrnes, et al.
Pageof 18