Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Filters

Martin Schweinsberg

Showing results (1-10 of 11) with videos related to

Pageof 2
Sort By:
Scientific Data|March 15, 2017
Replication data collection highlights value in diversity of replication attemptsK Andrew DeSoto, Martin Schweinsberg
Perspectives on Psychological Science : a Journal of the Association for Psychological Science|February 6, 2023
Research-Problem Validity in Primary Research: Precision and Transparency in Characterizing Past KnowledgeMartin Schweinsberg, Stefan Thau, Madan Pillutla
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America|October 31, 2024
The behavioral negotiation perspective can reveal how to navigate discord in sustainability transformations constructivelyJohann M Majer, Simon Columbus, Martin Schweinsberg
The Behavioral and Brain Sciences|May 9, 2019
Making prepublication independent replication mainstreamWarren Tierney, Martin Schweinsberg, Eric Luis Uhlmann
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology|March 30, 2018
Imaginary alternatives: The effects of mental simulation on powerless negotiatorsMichael Schaerer, Martin Schweinsberg, Roderick I Swaab
The Behavioral and Brain Sciences|February 10, 2022
Exposing and overcoming the fixed-effect fallacy through crowd scienceWilson Cyrus-Lai, Warren Tierney, Martin Schweinsberg, et al.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America|August 1, 2023
Understanding the first-offer conundrum: How buyer offers impact sale price and impasse risk in 26 million eBay negotiationsMartin Schweinsberg, Hannes M Petrowsky, Burkhardt Funk, et al.
Royal Society Open Science|July 25, 2024
Subjective evidence evaluation survey for many-analysts studiesAlexandra Sarafoglou, Suzanne Hoogeveen, Don van den Bergh, et al.
Psychological Bulletin|January 17, 2020
Crowdsourcing hypothesis tests: Making transparent how design choices shape research resultsJustin F Landy, Miaolei Liam Jia, Isabel L Ding, et al.
Elife|November 9, 2021
Consensus-based guidance for conducting and reporting multi-analyst studiesBalazs Aczel, Barnabas Szaszi, Gustav Nilsonne, et al.
Pageof 2

Showing results (1-10 of 11) with videos related to

Sort By:
Pageof 2
Scientific Data|March 15, 2017
Replication data collection highlights value in diversity of replication attemptsK Andrew DeSoto, Martin Schweinsberg
Perspectives on Psychological Science : a Journal of the Association for Psychological Science|February 6, 2023
Research-Problem Validity in Primary Research: Precision and Transparency in Characterizing Past KnowledgeMartin Schweinsberg, Stefan Thau, Madan Pillutla
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America|October 31, 2024
The behavioral negotiation perspective can reveal how to navigate discord in sustainability transformations constructivelyJohann M Majer, Simon Columbus, Martin Schweinsberg
The Behavioral and Brain Sciences|May 9, 2019
Making prepublication independent replication mainstreamWarren Tierney, Martin Schweinsberg, Eric Luis Uhlmann
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology|March 30, 2018
Imaginary alternatives: The effects of mental simulation on powerless negotiatorsMichael Schaerer, Martin Schweinsberg, Roderick I Swaab
The Behavioral and Brain Sciences|February 10, 2022
Exposing and overcoming the fixed-effect fallacy through crowd scienceWilson Cyrus-Lai, Warren Tierney, Martin Schweinsberg, et al.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America|August 1, 2023
Understanding the first-offer conundrum: How buyer offers impact sale price and impasse risk in 26 million eBay negotiationsMartin Schweinsberg, Hannes M Petrowsky, Burkhardt Funk, et al.
Royal Society Open Science|July 25, 2024
Subjective evidence evaluation survey for many-analysts studiesAlexandra Sarafoglou, Suzanne Hoogeveen, Don van den Bergh, et al.
Psychological Bulletin|January 17, 2020
Crowdsourcing hypothesis tests: Making transparent how design choices shape research resultsJustin F Landy, Miaolei Liam Jia, Isabel L Ding, et al.
Elife|November 9, 2021
Consensus-based guidance for conducting and reporting multi-analyst studiesBalazs Aczel, Barnabas Szaszi, Gustav Nilsonne, et al.
Pageof 2