Showing results (1-10 of 472) with videos related to

Sort By:
Pageof 48
International Journal of Molecular Sciences|May 14, 2022
Regulatory T Cells with Additional COX-2 Expression Are Independent Negative Prognosticators for Vulvar Cancer PatientsNadine Ansorge, Christian Dannecker, Udo Jeschke, et al.
Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)|April 3, 2021
Combined COX-2/PPARγ Expression as Independent Negative Prognosticator for Vulvar Cancer PatientsNadine Ansorge, Christian Dannecker, Udo Jeschke, et al.
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics|May 15, 2025
Breast cancer in patients under 40 years: an 11-year retrospective cohort analysisFranziska Ganster, Simone Schrodi, Michael Braun, et al.
Breast Care (Basel, Switzerland)|October 9, 2025
Impact of Therapy on Health-Related Quality of Life in Breast Cancer Patients >60 YearsMaximiliane Burgmann, Valerie Schlager, Annika Lotz, et al.
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics|January 25, 2018
Evaluation of an interdisciplinary palliative care inhouse training for professionals in gynecological oncologyThomas Kolben, Birgit Haberland, Tom Degenhardt, et al.
Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology|September 20, 2017
The G protein-coupled estrogen receptor (GPER/GPR30) may serve as a prognostic marker in early-stage cervical cancerKlaus Friese, Bernd Kost, Aurelia Vattai, et al.
Breast Care (Basel, Switzerland)|June 12, 2018
Evaluation of Reproductive Concerns and Biographical Impact of Breast Cancer in Young PatientsMaximiliane Burgmann, Kerstin Hermelink, Alex Farr, et al.
Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology|August 1, 2018
TA-MUC1 as detected by the fully humanized, therapeutic antibody Gatipotzumab predicts poor prognosis in cervical cancerSabine Heublein, Klaus Friese, Bernd Kost, et al.
Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology|November 8, 2018
The role of EP3-receptor expression in cervical dysplasiaAnna Hester, Manuel Ritzer, Christina Kuhn, et al.
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics|April 14, 2017
Short interval between two Pap smears: effect on the result of the second smear? A prospective randomized trialTheresa M Kolben, Florian Bergauer, Jochen Moeckel, et al.
Pageof 48