Showing results (1-10 of 101) with videos related to
Sort By:
Pageof 11
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology|April 8, 2020
Online survey about the STROBE statement highlighted diverging views about its content, purpose, and valueMelissa K Sharp, Ketevan Glonti, Darko HrenBMJ Open|October 21, 2018
Editors' perspectives on the peer-review process in biomedical journals: protocol for a qualitative studyKetevan Glonti, Darko HrenBMJ Open|August 15, 2020
Journal editors' perspectives on the communication practices in biomedical journals: a qualitative studyKetevan Glonti, Isabelle Boutron, David Moher, et al.BMJ Open|November 27, 2019
Journal editors' perspectives on the roles and tasks of peer reviewers in biomedical journals: a qualitative studyKetevan Glonti, Isabelle Boutron, David Moher, et al.BMC Medicine|June 21, 2019
A scoping review on the roles and tasks of peer reviewers in the manuscript review process in biomedical journalsKetevan Glonti, Daniel Cauchi, Erik Cobo, et al.BMJ Open|October 25, 2017
A scoping review protocol on the roles and tasks of peer reviewers in the manuscript review process in biomedical journalsKetevan Glonti, Daniel Cauchi, Erik Cobo, et al.Journal of Clinical Epidemiology|August 10, 2019
Using the STROBE statement: survey findings emphasized the role of journals in enforcing reporting guidelinesMelissa K Sharp, Lorenzo Bertizzolo, Roser Rius, et al.BMJ Open|October 25, 2017
The STROBE extensions: protocol for a qualitative assessment of content and a survey of endorsementMelissa K Sharp, Ana Utrobičić, Guadalupe Gómez, et al.Journal of Clinical Epidemiology|November 14, 2018
A cross-sectional bibliometric study showed suboptimal journal endorsement rates of STROBE and its extensionsMelissa K Sharp, Ružica Tokalić, Guadalupe Gómez, et al.BMC Medicine|June 29, 2019
DIABRISK-SL trial: further consideration of age and impact of imputationsEfstathia Gkioni, Ketevan Glonti, Susanna Dodd, et al.Pageof 11