Showing results (301-310 of 474) with videos related to

Sort By:
Pageof 48
Radiographics : a Review Publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc|September 17, 2021
Tuberous Sclerosis: Current UpdateMindy X Wang, Nicole Segaran, Sanjeev Bhalla, et al.
BJR Open|November 13, 2023
CT image-based biomarkers acquired by AI-based algorithms for the opportunistic prediction of fallsDaniel Liu, Neil C Binkley, Alberto Perez, et al.
Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)|February 15, 2022
An Adaptive Learning Model for Multiscale Texture Features in Polyp Classification via Computed Tomographic ColonographyWeiguo Cao, Marc J Pomeroy, Shu Zhang, et al.
Radiology|May 23, 2023
Opportunistic Screening: Radiology Scientific Expert PanelPerry J Pickhardt, Ronald M Summers, John W Garrett, et al.
International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery|July 2, 2025
Improved muscle and fat segmentation for body composition measures on quantitative CTJianfei Liu, Praveen Thoppey Srinivasan Balamuralikrishna, Sovira Tan, et al.
AJR. American Journal of Roentgenology|October 12, 2016
Accuracy of Liver Fat Quantification With Advanced CT, MRI, and Ultrasound Techniques: Prospective Comparison With MR SpectroscopyHarald Kramer, Perry J Pickhardt, Mark A Kliewer, et al.
European Radiology|February 1, 2014
Contrast coating for the surface of flat polyps at CT colonography: a marker for detectionDavid H Kim, J Louis Hinshaw, Meghan G Lubner, et al.
AJR. American Journal of Roentgenology|November 10, 2021
Detection of High-Risk Sessile Serrated Lesions: Multitarget Stool DNA Versus CT ColonographyNimrod Deiss-Yehiely, Peter M Graffy, Benjamin Weigman, et al.
Journal of Thoracic Imaging|September 21, 2023
Correcting Posterior Paraspinal Muscle Computed Tomography Density for Intravenous Contrast Material Independent of Sex and Vascular PhaseJevin Lortie, Benjamin Rush, Grace Gage, et al.
The Journal of Urology|October 22, 2011
Automated renal stone volume measurement by noncontrast computerized tomography is more reproducible than manual linear size measurementSutchin R Patel, Paul Stanton, Nathan Zelinski, et al.
Pageof 48