Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Filters

Michael N Stagnaro

Showing results (1-10 of 12) with videos related to

Pageof 2
Sort By:
The Behavioral and Brain Sciences|May 9, 2019
Individual difference in acts of self-sacrificeMichael N Stagnaro, Rebecca Littman, David G Rand
Cognition|March 3, 2017
From good institutions to generous citizens: Top-down incentives to cooperate promote subsequent prosociality but not norm enforcementMichael N Stagnaro, Antonio A Arechar, David G Rand
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America|July 31, 2023
No association between numerical ability and politically motivated reasoning in a large US probability sampleMichael N Stagnaro, Ben M Tappin, David G Rand
Plos One|April 14, 2023
The effects of short messages encouraging prevention behaviors early in the COVID-19 pandemicSophia L Pink, Michael N Stagnaro, James Chu, et al.
Nature Human Behaviour|June 22, 2026
Representativeness and response validity across nine opt-in online samplesMichael N Stagnaro, James N Druckman, Adam J Berinsky, et al.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America|May 9, 2025
Durably reducing partisan animosity through multiple scalable treatmentsMatthew E K Hall, Brittany C Solomon, Jan G Voelkel, et al.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America|January 12, 2024
Academics are more specific, and practitioners more sensitive, in forecasting interventions to strengthen democratic attitudesJames Y Chu, Jan G Voelkel, Michael N Stagnaro, et al.
Nature Human Behaviour|November 1, 2022
Interventions reducing affective polarization do not necessarily improve anti-democratic attitudesJan G Voelkel, James Chu, Michael N Stagnaro, et al.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America|May 30, 2023
Correcting misperceptions of out-partisans decreases American legislators' support for undemocratic practicesJames N Druckman, Suji Kang, James Chu, et al.
Nature Human Behaviour|June 29, 2023
Understanding and combatting misinformation across 16 countries on six continentsAntonio A Arechar, Jennifer Allen, Adam J Berinsky, et al.
Pageof 2

Showing results (1-10 of 12) with videos related to

Sort By:
Pageof 2
The Behavioral and Brain Sciences|May 9, 2019
Individual difference in acts of self-sacrificeMichael N Stagnaro, Rebecca Littman, David G Rand
Cognition|March 3, 2017
From good institutions to generous citizens: Top-down incentives to cooperate promote subsequent prosociality but not norm enforcementMichael N Stagnaro, Antonio A Arechar, David G Rand
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America|July 31, 2023
No association between numerical ability and politically motivated reasoning in a large US probability sampleMichael N Stagnaro, Ben M Tappin, David G Rand
Plos One|April 14, 2023
The effects of short messages encouraging prevention behaviors early in the COVID-19 pandemicSophia L Pink, Michael N Stagnaro, James Chu, et al.
Nature Human Behaviour|June 22, 2026
Representativeness and response validity across nine opt-in online samplesMichael N Stagnaro, James N Druckman, Adam J Berinsky, et al.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America|May 9, 2025
Durably reducing partisan animosity through multiple scalable treatmentsMatthew E K Hall, Brittany C Solomon, Jan G Voelkel, et al.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America|January 12, 2024
Academics are more specific, and practitioners more sensitive, in forecasting interventions to strengthen democratic attitudesJames Y Chu, Jan G Voelkel, Michael N Stagnaro, et al.
Nature Human Behaviour|November 1, 2022
Interventions reducing affective polarization do not necessarily improve anti-democratic attitudesJan G Voelkel, James Chu, Michael N Stagnaro, et al.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America|May 30, 2023
Correcting misperceptions of out-partisans decreases American legislators' support for undemocratic practicesJames N Druckman, Suji Kang, James Chu, et al.
Nature Human Behaviour|June 29, 2023
Understanding and combatting misinformation across 16 countries on six continentsAntonio A Arechar, Jennifer Allen, Adam J Berinsky, et al.
Pageof 2