Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Filters

Michael T Bradley

Showing results (1-10 of 8) with videos related to

Pageof 1
Sort By:
The Journal of General Psychology|October 13, 2017
Out with .05, in with Replication and Measurement: Isolating and Working with the Particular Effect Sizes that are Troublesome for Inferential StatisticsMichael T Bradley, Andrew Brand
Psychological Reports|April 26, 2018
The Precision of Effect Size Estimation From Published Psychological Research: Surveying Confidence IntervalsAndrew Brand, Michael T Bradley
BMC Research Notes|April 27, 2016
Accuracy when inferential statistics are used as measurement toolsMichael T Bradley, Andrew Brand
Psychological Reports|August 10, 2016
Significance Testing Needs a Taxonomy: Or How the Fisher, Neyman-Pearson Controversy Resulted in the Inferential Tail Wagging the Measurement DogMichael T Bradley, Andrew Brand
The Journal of General Psychology|May 20, 2014
More Voodoo correlations: when average-based measures inflate correlationsAndrew Brand, Michael T Bradley
The Journal of General Psychology|March 17, 2011
Multiple trials may yield exaggerated effect size estimatesAndrew Brand, Michael T Bradley, Lisa A Best, et al.
Perceptual and Motor Skills|June 18, 2008
Accuracy of effect size estimates from published psychological researchAndrew Brand, Michael T Bradley, Lisa A Best, et al.
Frontiers in Psychology|June 6, 2018
Manipulating the Alpha Level Cannot Cure Significance TestingDavid Trafimow, Valentin Amrhein, Corson N Areshenkoff, et al.
Pageof 1

Showing results (1-10 of 8) with videos related to

Sort By:
Pageof 1
The Journal of General Psychology|October 13, 2017
Out with .05, in with Replication and Measurement: Isolating and Working with the Particular Effect Sizes that are Troublesome for Inferential StatisticsMichael T Bradley, Andrew Brand
Psychological Reports|April 26, 2018
The Precision of Effect Size Estimation From Published Psychological Research: Surveying Confidence IntervalsAndrew Brand, Michael T Bradley
BMC Research Notes|April 27, 2016
Accuracy when inferential statistics are used as measurement toolsMichael T Bradley, Andrew Brand
Psychological Reports|August 10, 2016
Significance Testing Needs a Taxonomy: Or How the Fisher, Neyman-Pearson Controversy Resulted in the Inferential Tail Wagging the Measurement DogMichael T Bradley, Andrew Brand
The Journal of General Psychology|May 20, 2014
More Voodoo correlations: when average-based measures inflate correlationsAndrew Brand, Michael T Bradley
The Journal of General Psychology|March 17, 2011
Multiple trials may yield exaggerated effect size estimatesAndrew Brand, Michael T Bradley, Lisa A Best, et al.
Perceptual and Motor Skills|June 18, 2008
Accuracy of effect size estimates from published psychological researchAndrew Brand, Michael T Bradley, Lisa A Best, et al.
Frontiers in Psychology|June 6, 2018
Manipulating the Alpha Level Cannot Cure Significance TestingDavid Trafimow, Valentin Amrhein, Corson N Areshenkoff, et al.
Pageof 1