Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Filters

Michaela Eikermann

Showing results (1-10 of 38) with videos related to

Pageof 4
Sort By:
Zeitschrift Fur Evidenz, Fortbildung Und Qualitat Im Gesundheitswesen|December 10, 2013
[Deciding despite uncertainty]Michaela Eikermann, Gabriele Meyer
Gesundheitswesen (Bundesverband Der Arzte Des Offentlichen Gesundheitsdienstes (Germany))|December 11, 2023
[Are the assessments of individual out-of-pocket health services of the IGeL-Monitor in line with clinical guidelines?]Monika Becker, Ute Hansen, Michaela Eikermann
Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine|August 27, 2014
Impact of choice of quality appraisal tool for systematic reviews in overviewsDawid Pieper, Tim Mathes, Michaela Eikermann
BMC Research Notes|September 7, 2014
Can AMSTAR also be applied to systematic reviews of non-randomized studies?Dawid Pieper, Tim Mathes, Michaela Eikermann
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology|October 16, 2013
Partial updating of clinical practice guidelines often makes more sense than full updating: a systematic review on methods and the development of an updating procedureMonika Becker, Edmund A M Neugebauer, Michaela Eikermann
Journal of the American College of Surgeons|March 27, 2013
State of evidence on the relationship between high-volume hospitals and outcomes in surgery: a systematic review of systematic reviewsDawid Pieper, Tim Mathes, Edmund Neugebauer, et al.
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology|September 11, 2012
Overviews of reviews often have limited rigor: a systematic reviewDawid Pieper, Roland Buechter, Petra Jerinic, et al.
BMC Research Notes|November 28, 2014
Tools for assessing the content of guidelines are needed to enable their effective use--a systematic comparisonMichaela Eikermann, Nicole Holzmann, Ulrich Siering, et al.
BMC Endocrine Disorders|July 9, 2014
Improving the adherence of type 2 diabetes mellitus patients with pharmacy care: a systematic review of randomized controlled trialsSunya-Lee Antoine, Dawid Pieper, Tim Mathes, et al.
Cancer Epidemiology|April 29, 2014
Adherence influencing factors in patients taking oral anticancer agents: a systematic reviewTim Mathes, Dawid Pieper, Sunya-Lee Antoine, et al.
Pageof 4

Showing results (1-10 of 38) with videos related to

Sort By:
Pageof 4
Zeitschrift Fur Evidenz, Fortbildung Und Qualitat Im Gesundheitswesen|December 10, 2013
[Deciding despite uncertainty]Michaela Eikermann, Gabriele Meyer
Gesundheitswesen (Bundesverband Der Arzte Des Offentlichen Gesundheitsdienstes (Germany))|December 11, 2023
[Are the assessments of individual out-of-pocket health services of the IGeL-Monitor in line with clinical guidelines?]Monika Becker, Ute Hansen, Michaela Eikermann
Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine|August 27, 2014
Impact of choice of quality appraisal tool for systematic reviews in overviewsDawid Pieper, Tim Mathes, Michaela Eikermann
BMC Research Notes|September 7, 2014
Can AMSTAR also be applied to systematic reviews of non-randomized studies?Dawid Pieper, Tim Mathes, Michaela Eikermann
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology|October 16, 2013
Partial updating of clinical practice guidelines often makes more sense than full updating: a systematic review on methods and the development of an updating procedureMonika Becker, Edmund A M Neugebauer, Michaela Eikermann
Journal of the American College of Surgeons|March 27, 2013
State of evidence on the relationship between high-volume hospitals and outcomes in surgery: a systematic review of systematic reviewsDawid Pieper, Tim Mathes, Edmund Neugebauer, et al.
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology|September 11, 2012
Overviews of reviews often have limited rigor: a systematic reviewDawid Pieper, Roland Buechter, Petra Jerinic, et al.
BMC Research Notes|November 28, 2014
Tools for assessing the content of guidelines are needed to enable their effective use--a systematic comparisonMichaela Eikermann, Nicole Holzmann, Ulrich Siering, et al.
BMC Endocrine Disorders|July 9, 2014
Improving the adherence of type 2 diabetes mellitus patients with pharmacy care: a systematic review of randomized controlled trialsSunya-Lee Antoine, Dawid Pieper, Tim Mathes, et al.
Cancer Epidemiology|April 29, 2014
Adherence influencing factors in patients taking oral anticancer agents: a systematic reviewTim Mathes, Dawid Pieper, Sunya-Lee Antoine, et al.
Pageof 4