Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Filters

Mitchell Schnall

Showing results (11-20 of 39) with videos related to

Pageof 4
Sort By:
JAMA Oncology|February 20, 2016
Effectiveness of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Compared With Digital Mammography: Outcomes Analysis From 3 Years of Breast Cancer ScreeningElizabeth S McDonald, Andrew Oustimov, Susan P Weinstein, et al.
Cancer|December 22, 2007
Comparison of triple-negative and estrogen receptor-positive/progesterone receptor-positive/HER2-negative breast carcinoma using quantitative fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose/positron emission tomography imaging parameters: a potentially useful method for disease characterizationSandip Basu, Wengen Chen, Julia Tchou, et al.
Academic Radiology|December 23, 2018
Advancing the Diagnostic Cockpit of the Future: An Opportunity to Improve Diagnostic Accuracy and EfficiencyElizabeth Krupinski, Mark Bronkalla, Les Folio, et al.
AJR. American Journal of Roentgenology|October 27, 2015
Baseline Screening Mammography: Performance of Full-Field Digital Mammography Versus Digital Breast TomosynthesisElizabeth S McDonald, Anne Marie McCarthy, Amana L Akhtar, et al.
Journal of the National Cancer Institute|October 15, 2014
Screening outcomes following implementation of digital breast tomosynthesis in a general-population screening programAnne Marie McCarthy, Despina Kontos, Marie Synnestvedt, et al.
Nuclear Medicine Communications|February 16, 2006
FDG PET positive lymph nodes are highly predictive of metastasis in breast cancerRakesh Kumar, Hongming Zhuang, Mitchell Schnall, et al.
European Radiology|June 16, 2022
First-generation clinical dual-source photon-counting CT: ultra-low-dose quantitative spectral imagingLeening P Liu, Nadav Shapira, Andrew A Chen, et al.
Journal of Clinical Oncology : Official Journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology|September 17, 2024
Correlative Science in the Cooperative Group System: Re-Engineering for SuccessPeter J O'Dwyer, Norman Wolmark, Douglas S Hawkins, et al.
Radiology|January 5, 2021
Special Report of the RSNA COVID-19 Task Force: Crisis Leadership of Major Health System Radiology Departments during COVID-19Mahmud Mossa-Basha, Mitchell Schnall, Carolyn C Meltzer, et al.
Academic Radiology|October 31, 2006
Morphologic blooming in breast MRI as a characterization of margin for discriminating benign from malignant lesionsAlan Penn, Scott Thompson, Rachel Brem, et al.
Pageof 4

Showing results (11-20 of 39) with videos related to

Sort By:
Pageof 4
JAMA Oncology|February 20, 2016
Effectiveness of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Compared With Digital Mammography: Outcomes Analysis From 3 Years of Breast Cancer ScreeningElizabeth S McDonald, Andrew Oustimov, Susan P Weinstein, et al.
Cancer|December 22, 2007
Comparison of triple-negative and estrogen receptor-positive/progesterone receptor-positive/HER2-negative breast carcinoma using quantitative fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose/positron emission tomography imaging parameters: a potentially useful method for disease characterizationSandip Basu, Wengen Chen, Julia Tchou, et al.
Academic Radiology|December 23, 2018
Advancing the Diagnostic Cockpit of the Future: An Opportunity to Improve Diagnostic Accuracy and EfficiencyElizabeth Krupinski, Mark Bronkalla, Les Folio, et al.
AJR. American Journal of Roentgenology|October 27, 2015
Baseline Screening Mammography: Performance of Full-Field Digital Mammography Versus Digital Breast TomosynthesisElizabeth S McDonald, Anne Marie McCarthy, Amana L Akhtar, et al.
Journal of the National Cancer Institute|October 15, 2014
Screening outcomes following implementation of digital breast tomosynthesis in a general-population screening programAnne Marie McCarthy, Despina Kontos, Marie Synnestvedt, et al.
Nuclear Medicine Communications|February 16, 2006
FDG PET positive lymph nodes are highly predictive of metastasis in breast cancerRakesh Kumar, Hongming Zhuang, Mitchell Schnall, et al.
European Radiology|June 16, 2022
First-generation clinical dual-source photon-counting CT: ultra-low-dose quantitative spectral imagingLeening P Liu, Nadav Shapira, Andrew A Chen, et al.
Journal of Clinical Oncology : Official Journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology|September 17, 2024
Correlative Science in the Cooperative Group System: Re-Engineering for SuccessPeter J O'Dwyer, Norman Wolmark, Douglas S Hawkins, et al.
Radiology|January 5, 2021
Special Report of the RSNA COVID-19 Task Force: Crisis Leadership of Major Health System Radiology Departments during COVID-19Mahmud Mossa-Basha, Mitchell Schnall, Carolyn C Meltzer, et al.
Academic Radiology|October 31, 2006
Morphologic blooming in breast MRI as a characterization of margin for discriminating benign from malignant lesionsAlan Penn, Scott Thompson, Rachel Brem, et al.
Pageof 4