Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Filters

Natalie Armstrong

Showing results (81-90 of 92) with videos related to

Pageof 10
Sort By:
Trials|September 14, 2012
A cluster randomized controlled trial of the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of intermediate care clinics for diabetes (ICCD): study protocol for a randomized controlled trialNatalie Armstrong, Darrin Baines, Richard Baker, et al.
Trials|July 8, 2011
INVESTIGATE-I (INVasive Evaluation before Surgical Treatment of Incontinence Gives Added Therapeutic Effect?): study protocol for a mixed methods study to assess the feasibility of a future randomised controlled trial of the clinical utility of invasive urodynamic testingMegan Murdoch, Elaine McColl, Denise Howel, et al.
Health Technology Assessment (Winchester, England)|February 26, 2015
INVESTIGATE-I (INVasive Evaluation before Surgical Treatment of Incontinence Gives Added Therapeutic Effect?): a mixed-methods study to assess the feasibility of a future randomised controlled trial of invasive urodynamic testing prior to surgery for stress urinary incontinence in womenPaul Hilton, Natalie Armstrong, Catherine Brennand, et al.
BMJ Open|August 25, 2019
Optimising neonatal service provision for preterm babies born between 27 and 31 weeks gestation in England (OPTI-PREM), using national data, qualitative research and economic analysis: a study protocolThillagavathie Pillay, Neena Modi, Oliver Rivero-Arias, et al.
Trials|September 10, 2015
A mixed methods study to assess the feasibility of a randomised controlled trial of invasive urodynamic testing versus clinical assessment and non-invasive tests prior to surgery for stress urinary incontinence in women: the INVESTIGATE-I studyPaul Hilton, Natalie Armstrong, Catherine Brennand, et al.
Frontiers in Health Services|March 7, 2025
What is improvement science, and what makes it different? An outline of the field and its frontiersJulie E Reed, Grazia Antonacci, Natalie Armstrong, et al.
ERJ Open Research|August 16, 2023
A typology of healthcare pathways after hospital discharge for adults with COVID-19: the evolution of UK services during pandemic conditionsLinzy Houchen-Wolloff, Charlotte Overton, Andrew Ibbetson, et al.
Health and Social Care Delivery Research|April 15, 2025
Optimising neonatal services for very preterm births between 27<sup>+0</sup> and 31<sup>+6</sup> weeks gestation in England: the OPTI-PREM mixed-methods studyThillagavathie Pillay, Oliver Rivero-Arias, Natalie Armstrong, et al.
BMJ Open|January 23, 2023
Cluster randomised controlled trial of screening for atrial fibrillation in people aged 70 years and over to reduce stroke: protocol for the pilot study for the SAFER trialKate Williams, Rakesh Narendra Modi, Andrew Dymond, et al.
Wellcome Open Research|September 16, 2020
Half a Century of Wilson & Jungner: Reflections on the Governance of Population ScreeningSteve Sturdy, Fiona Miller, Stuart Hogarth, et al.
Pageof 10

Showing results (81-90 of 92) with videos related to

Sort By:
Pageof 10
Trials|September 14, 2012
A cluster randomized controlled trial of the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of intermediate care clinics for diabetes (ICCD): study protocol for a randomized controlled trialNatalie Armstrong, Darrin Baines, Richard Baker, et al.
Trials|July 8, 2011
INVESTIGATE-I (INVasive Evaluation before Surgical Treatment of Incontinence Gives Added Therapeutic Effect?): study protocol for a mixed methods study to assess the feasibility of a future randomised controlled trial of the clinical utility of invasive urodynamic testingMegan Murdoch, Elaine McColl, Denise Howel, et al.
Health Technology Assessment (Winchester, England)|February 26, 2015
INVESTIGATE-I (INVasive Evaluation before Surgical Treatment of Incontinence Gives Added Therapeutic Effect?): a mixed-methods study to assess the feasibility of a future randomised controlled trial of invasive urodynamic testing prior to surgery for stress urinary incontinence in womenPaul Hilton, Natalie Armstrong, Catherine Brennand, et al.
BMJ Open|August 25, 2019
Optimising neonatal service provision for preterm babies born between 27 and 31 weeks gestation in England (OPTI-PREM), using national data, qualitative research and economic analysis: a study protocolThillagavathie Pillay, Neena Modi, Oliver Rivero-Arias, et al.
Trials|September 10, 2015
A mixed methods study to assess the feasibility of a randomised controlled trial of invasive urodynamic testing versus clinical assessment and non-invasive tests prior to surgery for stress urinary incontinence in women: the INVESTIGATE-I studyPaul Hilton, Natalie Armstrong, Catherine Brennand, et al.
Frontiers in Health Services|March 7, 2025
What is improvement science, and what makes it different? An outline of the field and its frontiersJulie E Reed, Grazia Antonacci, Natalie Armstrong, et al.
ERJ Open Research|August 16, 2023
A typology of healthcare pathways after hospital discharge for adults with COVID-19: the evolution of UK services during pandemic conditionsLinzy Houchen-Wolloff, Charlotte Overton, Andrew Ibbetson, et al.
Health and Social Care Delivery Research|April 15, 2025
Optimising neonatal services for very preterm births between 27<sup>+0</sup> and 31<sup>+6</sup> weeks gestation in England: the OPTI-PREM mixed-methods studyThillagavathie Pillay, Oliver Rivero-Arias, Natalie Armstrong, et al.
BMJ Open|January 23, 2023
Cluster randomised controlled trial of screening for atrial fibrillation in people aged 70 years and over to reduce stroke: protocol for the pilot study for the SAFER trialKate Williams, Rakesh Narendra Modi, Andrew Dymond, et al.
Wellcome Open Research|September 16, 2020
Half a Century of Wilson & Jungner: Reflections on the Governance of Population ScreeningSteve Sturdy, Fiona Miller, Stuart Hogarth, et al.
Pageof 10