Showing results (1-10 of 22) with videos related to
Sort By:
Pageof 3
Forensic Science International|September 13, 2014
On relative distortion in fingerprint comparisonNathan D Kalka, R Austin HicklinForensic Science International|January 15, 2013
Assessing the clarity of friction ridge impressionsR Austin Hicklin, JoAnn Buscaglia, Maria Antonia RobertsForensic Science International|April 12, 2025
Accuracy and reproducibility of latent print decisions on comparisons from searches of an automated fingerprint identification systemR Austin Hicklin, Nicole Richetelli, AshLee Taylor, et al.Forensic Science International|November 4, 2020
Why do latent fingerprint examiners differ in their conclusions?R Austin Hicklin, Bradford T Ulery, Madeline Ausdemore, et al.Forensic Science International|January 2, 2015
Changes in latent fingerprint examiners' markup between analysis and comparisonBradford T Ulery, R Austin Hicklin, Maria Antonia Roberts, et al.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America|April 27, 2011
Accuracy and reliability of forensic latent fingerprint decisionsBradford T Ulery, R Austin Hicklin, Joann Buscaglia, et al.Journal of Forensic Sciences|April 18, 2025
Inter-laboratory variation in interpretations, comparisons, and statistical analyses of DNA mixturesR Austin Hicklin, Nicole Richetelli, Robert A Bever, et al.Data in Brief|June 14, 2016
Data on the interexaminer variation of minutia markup on latent fingerprintsBradford T Ulery, R Austin Hicklin, Maria Antonia Roberts, et al.Plos One|November 6, 2014
Measuring what latent fingerprint examiners consider sufficient information for individualization determinationsBradford T Ulery, R Austin Hicklin, Maria Antonia Roberts, et al.Forensic Science International|April 6, 2016
Interexaminer variation of minutia markup on latent fingerprintsBradford T Ulery, R Austin Hicklin, Maria Antonia Roberts, et al.Pageof 3