Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Filters

Nina Engelhardt

Showing results (11-20 of 19) with videos related to

Pageof 2
Sort By:
You have reached the last page of results.This site can display upto 19 results.
International Clinical Psychopharmacology|May 24, 2007
A novel approach to rater training and certification in multinational trialsElizabeth Jeglic, Kenneth A Kobak, Nina Engelhardt, et al.
International Clinical Psychopharmacology|April 15, 2008
The GRID-HAMD: standardization of the Hamilton Depression Rating ScaleJanet B W Williams, Kenneth A Kobak, Per Bech, et al.
Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology|June 4, 2010
Site versus centralized raters in a clinical depression trial: impact on patient selection and placebo responseKenneth A Kobak, Andrew Leuchter, David DeBrota, et al.
Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology|January 18, 2006
Rating the raters: assessing the quality of Hamilton rating scale for depression clinical interviews in two industry-sponsored clinical drug trialsNina Engelhardt, Alan D Feiger, Kenneth O Cogger, et al.
The American Journal of Psychiatry|December 7, 2005
Why the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale enduresPer Bech, Nina Engelhardt, Kenneth R Evans, et al.
Innovations in Clinical Neuroscience|July 15, 2016
Data Quality Monitoring in Clinical Trials: Has It Been Worth It? An Evaluation and Prediction of the Future by All Stakeholders, David Daniel, Amir Kalali, et al.
Journal of Affective Disorders|June 9, 2019
Consistency checks to improve measurement with the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS)Jonathan Rabinowitz, Nina R Schooler, Brianne Brown, et al.
Innovations in Clinical Neuroscience|December 16, 2016
The Depression Inventory Development Workgroup: A Collaborative, Empirically Driven Initiative to Develop a New Assessment Tool for Major Depressive DisorderAnthony L Vaccarino, Kenneth R Evans, Amir H Kalali, et al.
Innovations in Clinical Neuroscience|February 1, 2021
THE DEPRESSION INVENTORY DEVELOPMENT SCALE: Assessment of Psychometric Properties Using Classical and Modern Measurement Theory in a CAN-BIND TrialAnthony L Vaccarino, Amir H Kalali, Pierre Blier, et al.
Pageof 2

Showing results (11-20 of 19) with videos related to

Sort By:
Pageof 2
You have reached the last page of results.This site can display upto 19 results.
International Clinical Psychopharmacology|May 24, 2007
A novel approach to rater training and certification in multinational trialsElizabeth Jeglic, Kenneth A Kobak, Nina Engelhardt, et al.
International Clinical Psychopharmacology|April 15, 2008
The GRID-HAMD: standardization of the Hamilton Depression Rating ScaleJanet B W Williams, Kenneth A Kobak, Per Bech, et al.
Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology|June 4, 2010
Site versus centralized raters in a clinical depression trial: impact on patient selection and placebo responseKenneth A Kobak, Andrew Leuchter, David DeBrota, et al.
Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology|January 18, 2006
Rating the raters: assessing the quality of Hamilton rating scale for depression clinical interviews in two industry-sponsored clinical drug trialsNina Engelhardt, Alan D Feiger, Kenneth O Cogger, et al.
The American Journal of Psychiatry|December 7, 2005
Why the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale enduresPer Bech, Nina Engelhardt, Kenneth R Evans, et al.
Innovations in Clinical Neuroscience|July 15, 2016
Data Quality Monitoring in Clinical Trials: Has It Been Worth It? An Evaluation and Prediction of the Future by All Stakeholders, David Daniel, Amir Kalali, et al.
Journal of Affective Disorders|June 9, 2019
Consistency checks to improve measurement with the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS)Jonathan Rabinowitz, Nina R Schooler, Brianne Brown, et al.
Innovations in Clinical Neuroscience|December 16, 2016
The Depression Inventory Development Workgroup: A Collaborative, Empirically Driven Initiative to Develop a New Assessment Tool for Major Depressive DisorderAnthony L Vaccarino, Kenneth R Evans, Amir H Kalali, et al.
Innovations in Clinical Neuroscience|February 1, 2021
THE DEPRESSION INVENTORY DEVELOPMENT SCALE: Assessment of Psychometric Properties Using Classical and Modern Measurement Theory in a CAN-BIND TrialAnthony L Vaccarino, Amir H Kalali, Pierre Blier, et al.
Pageof 2