Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Filters

Oliver Heidinger

Showing results (11-20 of 21) with videos related to

Pageof 3
Sort By:
BMC Public Health|November 30, 2015
Small-area spatio-temporal analyses of participation rates in the mammography screening program in the city of Dortmund (NW Germany)Dorothea Lemke, Shoma Berkemeyer, Volkmar Mattauch, et al.
Radiology|October 28, 2015
Digital Mammography Screening: Does Age Influence the Detection Rates of Low-, Intermediate-, and High-Grade Ductal Carcinoma in Situ?Stefanie Weigel, Hans W Hense, Jan Heidrich, et al.
Rofo : Fortschritte Auf Dem Gebiete Der Rontgenstrahlen Und Der Nuklearmedizin|August 14, 2018
Higher Detection Rates of Biologically Aggressive Breast Cancers in Mammography Screening than in the Biennial IntervalAnna Prange, Beate Bokhof, Philipp Polzer, et al.
Deutsches Arzteblatt International|December 25, 2012
The incidence of interval cancers in the German mammography screening program: results from the population-based cancer registry in North Rhine-WestphaliaOliver Heidinger, Wolf Ulrich Batzler, Volker Krieg, et al.
Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland)|February 18, 2015
Digital mammography screening in Germany: Impact of age and histological subtype on program sensitivityOliver Heidinger, Jan Heidrich, Wolf Ulrich Batzler, et al.
Deutsches Arzteblatt International|August 29, 2018
Differences in Breast Cancer Characteristics by Mammography Screening Participation or Non-ParticipationBettina Braun, Laura Khil, Joke Tio, et al.
BMC Cancer|March 6, 2020
Incidence of advanced-stage breast cancer in regular participants of a mammography screening program: a prospective register-based studyLaura Khil, Jan Heidrich, Ina Wellmann, et al.
Radiology|November 7, 2017
Detection Rates of Ductal Carcinoma in Situ with Biennial Digital Mammography Screening: Radiologic Findings Support Pathologic Model of Tumor ProgressionStefanie Weigel, Laura Khil, Hans-Werner Hense, et al.
Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz|November 14, 2018
[Time trend in programme sensitivity within the German mammography screening programme in North Rhine-Westphalia and Lower Saxony]Beate Bokhof, Laura Khil, Iris Urbschat, et al.
BMJ Open|May 17, 2018
Digital breast tomosynthesis plus synthesised images versus standard full-field digital mammography in population-based screening (TOSYMA): protocol of a randomised controlled trialStefanie Weigel, Joachim Gerss, Hans-Werner Hense, et al.
Pageof 3

Showing results (11-20 of 21) with videos related to

Sort By:
Pageof 3
BMC Public Health|November 30, 2015
Small-area spatio-temporal analyses of participation rates in the mammography screening program in the city of Dortmund (NW Germany)Dorothea Lemke, Shoma Berkemeyer, Volkmar Mattauch, et al.
Radiology|October 28, 2015
Digital Mammography Screening: Does Age Influence the Detection Rates of Low-, Intermediate-, and High-Grade Ductal Carcinoma in Situ?Stefanie Weigel, Hans W Hense, Jan Heidrich, et al.
Rofo : Fortschritte Auf Dem Gebiete Der Rontgenstrahlen Und Der Nuklearmedizin|August 14, 2018
Higher Detection Rates of Biologically Aggressive Breast Cancers in Mammography Screening than in the Biennial IntervalAnna Prange, Beate Bokhof, Philipp Polzer, et al.
Deutsches Arzteblatt International|December 25, 2012
The incidence of interval cancers in the German mammography screening program: results from the population-based cancer registry in North Rhine-WestphaliaOliver Heidinger, Wolf Ulrich Batzler, Volker Krieg, et al.
Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland)|February 18, 2015
Digital mammography screening in Germany: Impact of age and histological subtype on program sensitivityOliver Heidinger, Jan Heidrich, Wolf Ulrich Batzler, et al.
Deutsches Arzteblatt International|August 29, 2018
Differences in Breast Cancer Characteristics by Mammography Screening Participation or Non-ParticipationBettina Braun, Laura Khil, Joke Tio, et al.
BMC Cancer|March 6, 2020
Incidence of advanced-stage breast cancer in regular participants of a mammography screening program: a prospective register-based studyLaura Khil, Jan Heidrich, Ina Wellmann, et al.
Radiology|November 7, 2017
Detection Rates of Ductal Carcinoma in Situ with Biennial Digital Mammography Screening: Radiologic Findings Support Pathologic Model of Tumor ProgressionStefanie Weigel, Laura Khil, Hans-Werner Hense, et al.
Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz|November 14, 2018
[Time trend in programme sensitivity within the German mammography screening programme in North Rhine-Westphalia and Lower Saxony]Beate Bokhof, Laura Khil, Iris Urbschat, et al.
BMJ Open|May 17, 2018
Digital breast tomosynthesis plus synthesised images versus standard full-field digital mammography in population-based screening (TOSYMA): protocol of a randomised controlled trialStefanie Weigel, Joachim Gerss, Hans-Werner Hense, et al.
Pageof 3