Showing results (411-420 of 1,335) with videos related to

Sort By:
Pageof 134
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America|April 3, 2003
Site-specific contributions to the pH dependence of protein stabilityMartin Tollinger, Karin A Crowhurst, Lewis E Kay, et al.
Journal of Biomolecular NMR|November 1, 1994
Backbone 1H and 15N resonance assignments of the N-terminal SH3 domain of drk in folded and unfolded states using enhanced-sensitivity pulsed field gradient NMR techniquesO Zhang, L E Kay, J P Olivier, et al.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America|August 30, 2022
Mapping the per-residue surface electrostatic potential of CAPRIN1 along its phase-separation trajectoryYuki Toyama, Atul Kaushik Rangadurai, Julie D Forman-Kay, et al.
The Journal of Biological Chemistry|July 3, 2004
Disorder in a target for the smad2 mad homology 2 domain and its implications for binding and specificityP Andrew Chong, Barish Ozdamar, Jeffrey L Wrana, et al.
British Journal of Cancer|February 22, 2007
Socioeconomic background in relation to stage at diagnosis, treatment and survival in women with breast cancerA Downing, K Prakash, M S Gilthorpe, et al.
Acta Neurologica Scandinavica|April 10, 2002
Post-epidural analgesia spinal cord infarction: MRI correlationL L Chan, A J Kumar, N E Leeds, et al.
Occupational Medicine (Oxford, England)|November 26, 2014
Investigating work-related neoplasia associated with solar radiationS Turner, S D Forman, R McNamee, et al.
Journal of Public Health (Oxford, England)|March 6, 2010
Geographical access to healthcare in Northern England and post-mortem diagnosis of cancerA P Jones, R Haynes, V Sauerzapf, et al.
BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.)|January 27, 2012
Systematic review of peer support for breastfeeding continuation: metaregression analysis of the effect of setting, intensity, and timingKate Jolly, Lucy Ingram, Khalid S Khan, et al.
BMC Medical Research Methodology|February 27, 2017
Test-treatment RCTs are susceptible to bias: a review of the methodological quality of randomized trials that evaluate diagnostic testsLavinia Ferrante di Ruffano, Jacqueline Dinnes, Alice J Sitch, et al.
Pageof 134