Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Filters

Patrick Bossuyt

Showing results (61-70 of 66) with videos related to

Pageof 7
Sort By:
You have reached the last page of results.This site can display upto 66 results.
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology|February 16, 2020
GRADE guidelines: 21 part 1. Study design, risk of bias, and indirectness in rating the certainty across a body of evidence for test accuracyHolger J Schünemann, Reem A Mustafa, Jan Brozek, et al.
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology|February 15, 2020
GRADE guidelines: 21 part 2. Test accuracy: inconsistency, imprecision, publication bias, and other domains for rating the certainty of evidence and presenting it in evidence profiles and summary of findings tablesHolger J Schünemann, Reem A Mustafa, Jan Brozek, et al.
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth|February 18, 2025
The TANGO-DM randomized controlled trial study protocol: treatment outcomes for gestational diabetes diagnosed according to WHO 2013 or WHO 1999 thresholdsDoortje Rademaker, Leon de Wit, Anne van der Wel, et al.
The Journal of Infectious Diseases|April 6, 2012
Evaluation of tuberculosis diagnostics in children: 2. Methodological issues for conducting and reporting research evaluations of tuberculosis diagnostics for intrathoracic tuberculosis in children. Consensus from an expert panelLuis E Cuevas, Renee Browning, Patrick Bossuyt, et al.
The Lancet. Neurology|July 20, 2017
Strategic roadmap for an early diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease based on biomarkersGiovanni B Frisoni, Marina Boccardi, Frederik Barkhof, et al.
Diagnostic and Prognostic Research|May 17, 2019
Erratum to: Methods for evaluating medical tests and biomarkersGowri Gopalakrishna, Miranda Langendam, Rob Scholten, et al.
Pageof 7

Showing results (61-70 of 66) with videos related to

Sort By:
Pageof 7
You have reached the last page of results.This site can display upto 66 results.
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology|February 16, 2020
GRADE guidelines: 21 part 1. Study design, risk of bias, and indirectness in rating the certainty across a body of evidence for test accuracyHolger J Schünemann, Reem A Mustafa, Jan Brozek, et al.
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology|February 15, 2020
GRADE guidelines: 21 part 2. Test accuracy: inconsistency, imprecision, publication bias, and other domains for rating the certainty of evidence and presenting it in evidence profiles and summary of findings tablesHolger J Schünemann, Reem A Mustafa, Jan Brozek, et al.
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth|February 18, 2025
The TANGO-DM randomized controlled trial study protocol: treatment outcomes for gestational diabetes diagnosed according to WHO 2013 or WHO 1999 thresholdsDoortje Rademaker, Leon de Wit, Anne van der Wel, et al.
The Journal of Infectious Diseases|April 6, 2012
Evaluation of tuberculosis diagnostics in children: 2. Methodological issues for conducting and reporting research evaluations of tuberculosis diagnostics for intrathoracic tuberculosis in children. Consensus from an expert panelLuis E Cuevas, Renee Browning, Patrick Bossuyt, et al.
The Lancet. Neurology|July 20, 2017
Strategic roadmap for an early diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease based on biomarkersGiovanni B Frisoni, Marina Boccardi, Frederik Barkhof, et al.
Diagnostic and Prognostic Research|May 17, 2019
Erratum to: Methods for evaluating medical tests and biomarkersGowri Gopalakrishna, Miranda Langendam, Rob Scholten, et al.
Pageof 7