Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Filters

Paul Whaley

Showing results (31-40 of 55) with videos related to

Pageof 6
Sort By:
Heliyon|July 18, 2022
Assessing author willingness to enter study information into structured data templates as part of the manuscript submission process: A pilot studyA Amina Wilkins, Paul Whaley, Amanda S Persad, et al.
Environment International|March 1, 2023
A new consensus on reconciling fire safety with environmental & health impacts of chemical flame retardantsJamie Page, Paul Whaley, Michelle Bellingham, et al.
Environment International|January 9, 2025
Development of a framework to structure decision-making in environmental and occupational health: A systematic review and Delphi studyEmily Senerth, Paul Whaley, Elie Akl, et al.
Environmental Evidence|January 24, 2024
Principles and framework for assessing the risk of bias for studies included in comparative quantitative environmental systematic reviewsGeoff Frampton, Paul Whaley, Micah Bennett, et al.
Environment International|December 24, 2021
Potential importance of residual confounding in systematic reviews of observational studies: Answer to Mathur and VanderTweeleJos H Verbeek, Paul Whaley, Rebecca L Morgan, et al.
Environment International|September 16, 2021
An approach to quantifying the potential importance of residual confounding in systematic reviews of observational studies: A GRADE concept paperJos H Verbeek, Paul Whaley, Rebecca L Morgan, et al.
Environment International|May 29, 2026
GRADE concept article: Evaluating risk of bias in a body of evidence from studies of environmental and other exposuresElizabeth G Radke, Suril S Mehta, Krista Y Christensen, et al.
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology|February 15, 2025
Quantitative assessment of inconsistency in meta-analysis using decision thresholds with two new indicesBernardo Sousa-Pinto, Ignacio Neumann, Rafael José Vieira, et al.
Archives of Toxicology|May 15, 2017
A primer on systematic reviews in toxicologySebastian Hoffmann, Rob B M de Vries, Martin L Stephens, et al.
Environment International|November 27, 2018
A risk of bias instrument for non-randomized studies of exposures: A users' guide to its application in the context of GRADERebecca L Morgan, Kristina A Thayer, Nancy Santesso, et al.
Pageof 6

Showing results (31-40 of 55) with videos related to

Sort By:
Pageof 6
Heliyon|July 18, 2022
Assessing author willingness to enter study information into structured data templates as part of the manuscript submission process: A pilot studyA Amina Wilkins, Paul Whaley, Amanda S Persad, et al.
Environment International|March 1, 2023
A new consensus on reconciling fire safety with environmental & health impacts of chemical flame retardantsJamie Page, Paul Whaley, Michelle Bellingham, et al.
Environment International|January 9, 2025
Development of a framework to structure decision-making in environmental and occupational health: A systematic review and Delphi studyEmily Senerth, Paul Whaley, Elie Akl, et al.
Environmental Evidence|January 24, 2024
Principles and framework for assessing the risk of bias for studies included in comparative quantitative environmental systematic reviewsGeoff Frampton, Paul Whaley, Micah Bennett, et al.
Environment International|December 24, 2021
Potential importance of residual confounding in systematic reviews of observational studies: Answer to Mathur and VanderTweeleJos H Verbeek, Paul Whaley, Rebecca L Morgan, et al.
Environment International|September 16, 2021
An approach to quantifying the potential importance of residual confounding in systematic reviews of observational studies: A GRADE concept paperJos H Verbeek, Paul Whaley, Rebecca L Morgan, et al.
Environment International|May 29, 2026
GRADE concept article: Evaluating risk of bias in a body of evidence from studies of environmental and other exposuresElizabeth G Radke, Suril S Mehta, Krista Y Christensen, et al.
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology|February 15, 2025
Quantitative assessment of inconsistency in meta-analysis using decision thresholds with two new indicesBernardo Sousa-Pinto, Ignacio Neumann, Rafael José Vieira, et al.
Archives of Toxicology|May 15, 2017
A primer on systematic reviews in toxicologySebastian Hoffmann, Rob B M de Vries, Martin L Stephens, et al.
Environment International|November 27, 2018
A risk of bias instrument for non-randomized studies of exposures: A users' guide to its application in the context of GRADERebecca L Morgan, Kristina A Thayer, Nancy Santesso, et al.
Pageof 6