Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Filters

Per Skaane

Showing results (11-20 of 53) with videos related to

Pageof 6
Sort By:
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation|May 2, 2009
Validity for the simplified water displacement instrument to measure arm lymphedema as a result of breast cancer surgeryAse Sagen, Rolf Kåresen, Per Skaane, et al.
Radiology|October 1, 2009
Screening-detected breast cancers: discordant independent double reading in a population-based screening programSolveig Hofvind, Berta M Geller, Robert D Rosenberg, et al.
Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland)|December 9, 2003
Fine-needle aspiration cytology in nonpalpable mammographic abnormalities in breast cancer screening: results from the breast cancer screening programme in Oslo 1996-2001Torin Sauer, Kristina Myrvold, Jon Lømo, et al.
European Journal of Epidemiology|June 28, 2007
Using the European guidelines to evaluate the Norwegian Breast Cancer Screening ProgramSolveig Hofvind, Berta Geller, Pamela M Vacek, et al.
Physics in Medicine and Biology|January 10, 2018
Average glandular dose in paired digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis acquisitions in a population based screening program: effects of measuring breast density, air kerma and beam qualityBjørn Helge Østerås, Per Skaane, Randi Gullien, et al.
European Radiology|August 8, 2007
Full-field digital mammography compared to screen film mammography in the prevalent round of a population-based screening programme: the Vestfold County StudyEinar Vigeland, Herman Klaasen, Tor Audun Klingen, et al.
Radiology|August 14, 2019
Digital Mammography versus Breast Tomosynthesis: Impact of Breast Density on Diagnostic Performance in Population-based ScreeningBjørn Helge Østerås, Anne Catrine T Martinsen, Randi Gullien, et al.
European Journal of Radiology|September 4, 2009
Typical atypical findings on dynamic MRI of the breastKathinka D Kurz, Sumit Roy, Ulrich Mödder, et al.
AJR. American Journal of Roentgenology|January 24, 2007
Effect of computer-aided detection on independent double reading of paired screen-film and full-field digital screening mammogramsPer Skaane, Ashwini Kshirsagar, Sandra Stapleton, et al.
Acta Radiologica (Stockholm, Sweden : 1987)|January 31, 2012
Mammography screening using independent double reading with consensus: is there a potential benefit for computer-aided detection?Per Skaane, Ashwini Kshirsagar, Solveig Hofvind, et al.
Pageof 6

Showing results (11-20 of 53) with videos related to

Sort By:
Pageof 6
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation|May 2, 2009
Validity for the simplified water displacement instrument to measure arm lymphedema as a result of breast cancer surgeryAse Sagen, Rolf Kåresen, Per Skaane, et al.
Radiology|October 1, 2009
Screening-detected breast cancers: discordant independent double reading in a population-based screening programSolveig Hofvind, Berta M Geller, Robert D Rosenberg, et al.
Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland)|December 9, 2003
Fine-needle aspiration cytology in nonpalpable mammographic abnormalities in breast cancer screening: results from the breast cancer screening programme in Oslo 1996-2001Torin Sauer, Kristina Myrvold, Jon Lømo, et al.
European Journal of Epidemiology|June 28, 2007
Using the European guidelines to evaluate the Norwegian Breast Cancer Screening ProgramSolveig Hofvind, Berta Geller, Pamela M Vacek, et al.
Physics in Medicine and Biology|January 10, 2018
Average glandular dose in paired digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis acquisitions in a population based screening program: effects of measuring breast density, air kerma and beam qualityBjørn Helge Østerås, Per Skaane, Randi Gullien, et al.
European Radiology|August 8, 2007
Full-field digital mammography compared to screen film mammography in the prevalent round of a population-based screening programme: the Vestfold County StudyEinar Vigeland, Herman Klaasen, Tor Audun Klingen, et al.
Radiology|August 14, 2019
Digital Mammography versus Breast Tomosynthesis: Impact of Breast Density on Diagnostic Performance in Population-based ScreeningBjørn Helge Østerås, Anne Catrine T Martinsen, Randi Gullien, et al.
European Journal of Radiology|September 4, 2009
Typical atypical findings on dynamic MRI of the breastKathinka D Kurz, Sumit Roy, Ulrich Mödder, et al.
AJR. American Journal of Roentgenology|January 24, 2007
Effect of computer-aided detection on independent double reading of paired screen-film and full-field digital screening mammogramsPer Skaane, Ashwini Kshirsagar, Sandra Stapleton, et al.
Acta Radiologica (Stockholm, Sweden : 1987)|January 31, 2012
Mammography screening using independent double reading with consensus: is there a potential benefit for computer-aided detection?Per Skaane, Ashwini Kshirsagar, Solveig Hofvind, et al.
Pageof 6