Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Filters

Peter F Arndt

Showing results (21-30 of 58) with videos related to

Pageof 6
Sort By:
Molecular Biology and Evolution|July 30, 2003
Distinct changes of genomic biases in nucleotide substitution at the time of Mammalian radiationPeter F Arndt, Dmitri A Petrov, Terence Hwa
Molecular Biology and Evolution|April 9, 2013
Twisted signatures of GC-biased gene conversion embedded in an evolutionary stable karyotypeCarina F Mugal, Peter F Arndt, Hans Ellegren
Scientific Reports|August 5, 2016
Evolutionary dynamics of selfish DNA explains the abundance distribution of genomic subsequencesMichael Sheinman, Anna Ramisch, Florian Massip, et al.
BMC Biology|October 20, 2006
Minor shift in background substitutional patterns in the Drosophila saltans and willistoni lineages is insufficient to explain GC content of coding sequencesNadia D Singh, Peter F Arndt, Dmitri A Petrov
Genome Biology and Evolution|February 21, 2025
Reconstruction of Segmental Duplication Rates and Associated Genomic Features by Network AnalysisEldar T Abdullaev, Dinesh A Haridoss, Peter F Arndt
BMC Genomics|July 3, 2021
Modelling segmental duplications in the human genomeEldar T Abdullaev, Iren R Umarova, Peter F Arndt
Gene|December 14, 2005
Identification of highly specific localized sequence motifs in human ribosomal protein gene promotersStefan Roepcke, Degui Zhi, Martin Vingron, et al.
Computational Biology and Chemistry|September 3, 2014
Evidence of a cancer type-specific distribution for consecutive somatic mutation distancesJose M Muiño, Ercan E Kuruoğlu, Peter F Arndt
Genetics|November 3, 2004
Genomic heterogeneity of background substitutional patterns in Drosophila melanogasterNadia D Singh, Peter F Arndt, Dmitri A Petrov
Genetics|July 31, 2016
Comparing the Statistical Fate of Paralogous and Orthologous SequencesFlorian Massip, Michael Sheinman, Sophie Schbath, et al.
Pageof 6

Showing results (21-30 of 58) with videos related to

Sort By:
Pageof 6
Molecular Biology and Evolution|July 30, 2003
Distinct changes of genomic biases in nucleotide substitution at the time of Mammalian radiationPeter F Arndt, Dmitri A Petrov, Terence Hwa
Molecular Biology and Evolution|April 9, 2013
Twisted signatures of GC-biased gene conversion embedded in an evolutionary stable karyotypeCarina F Mugal, Peter F Arndt, Hans Ellegren
Scientific Reports|August 5, 2016
Evolutionary dynamics of selfish DNA explains the abundance distribution of genomic subsequencesMichael Sheinman, Anna Ramisch, Florian Massip, et al.
BMC Biology|October 20, 2006
Minor shift in background substitutional patterns in the Drosophila saltans and willistoni lineages is insufficient to explain GC content of coding sequencesNadia D Singh, Peter F Arndt, Dmitri A Petrov
Genome Biology and Evolution|February 21, 2025
Reconstruction of Segmental Duplication Rates and Associated Genomic Features by Network AnalysisEldar T Abdullaev, Dinesh A Haridoss, Peter F Arndt
BMC Genomics|July 3, 2021
Modelling segmental duplications in the human genomeEldar T Abdullaev, Iren R Umarova, Peter F Arndt
Gene|December 14, 2005
Identification of highly specific localized sequence motifs in human ribosomal protein gene promotersStefan Roepcke, Degui Zhi, Martin Vingron, et al.
Computational Biology and Chemistry|September 3, 2014
Evidence of a cancer type-specific distribution for consecutive somatic mutation distancesJose M Muiño, Ercan E Kuruoğlu, Peter F Arndt
Genetics|November 3, 2004
Genomic heterogeneity of background substitutional patterns in Drosophila melanogasterNadia D Singh, Peter F Arndt, Dmitri A Petrov
Genetics|July 31, 2016
Comparing the Statistical Fate of Paralogous and Orthologous SequencesFlorian Massip, Michael Sheinman, Sophie Schbath, et al.
Pageof 6