Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Filters

Peter McCulloch

Showing results (141-150 of 148) with videos related to

Pageof 15
Sort By:
You have reached the last page of results.This site can display upto 148 results.
Nature Medicine|January 31, 2024
Author Correction: The IDEAL framework for surgical robotics: development, comparative evaluation and long-term monitoringHani J Marcus, Pedro T Ramirez, Danyal Z Khan, et al.
Nature Medicine|August 12, 2022
Publisher Correction: Reporting guideline for the early-stage clinical evaluation of decision support systems driven by artificial intelligence: DECIDE-AIBaptiste Vasey, Myura Nagendran, Bruce Campbell, et al.
The Lancet Regional Health. Europe|November 20, 2025
Recommended methodologies for clinical investigations of high-risk medical devices-Conclusions from the European Union CORE-MD ProjectAlan G Fraser, Sergio Buccheri, Robert A Byrne, et al.
Nature Medicine|January 16, 2023
PRISMA AI reporting guidelines for systematic reviews and meta-analyses on AI in healthcareGiovanni E Cacciamani, Timothy N Chu, Daniel I Sanford, et al.
BMJ Surgery, Interventions, & Health Technologies|January 20, 2022
Assessing the development status of intraoperative fluorescence imaging for perfusion assessments, using the IDEAL frameworkTakeaki Ishizawa, Peter McCulloch, Derek Muehrcke, et al.
Lancet (London, England)|September 29, 2009
Challenges in evaluating surgical innovationPatrick L Ergina, Jonathan A Cook, Jane M Blazeby, et al.
Lancet (London, England)|September 29, 2009
Evaluation and stages of surgical innovationsJeffrey S Barkun, Jeffrey K Aronson, Liane S Feldman, et al.
Lancet (London, England)|September 29, 2009
No surgical innovation without evaluation: the IDEAL recommendationsPeter McCulloch, Douglas G Altman, W Bruce Campbell, et al.
Pageof 15

Showing results (141-150 of 148) with videos related to

Sort By:
Pageof 15
You have reached the last page of results.This site can display upto 148 results.
Nature Medicine|January 31, 2024
Author Correction: The IDEAL framework for surgical robotics: development, comparative evaluation and long-term monitoringHani J Marcus, Pedro T Ramirez, Danyal Z Khan, et al.
Nature Medicine|August 12, 2022
Publisher Correction: Reporting guideline for the early-stage clinical evaluation of decision support systems driven by artificial intelligence: DECIDE-AIBaptiste Vasey, Myura Nagendran, Bruce Campbell, et al.
The Lancet Regional Health. Europe|November 20, 2025
Recommended methodologies for clinical investigations of high-risk medical devices-Conclusions from the European Union CORE-MD ProjectAlan G Fraser, Sergio Buccheri, Robert A Byrne, et al.
Nature Medicine|January 16, 2023
PRISMA AI reporting guidelines for systematic reviews and meta-analyses on AI in healthcareGiovanni E Cacciamani, Timothy N Chu, Daniel I Sanford, et al.
BMJ Surgery, Interventions, & Health Technologies|January 20, 2022
Assessing the development status of intraoperative fluorescence imaging for perfusion assessments, using the IDEAL frameworkTakeaki Ishizawa, Peter McCulloch, Derek Muehrcke, et al.
Lancet (London, England)|September 29, 2009
Challenges in evaluating surgical innovationPatrick L Ergina, Jonathan A Cook, Jane M Blazeby, et al.
Lancet (London, England)|September 29, 2009
Evaluation and stages of surgical innovationsJeffrey S Barkun, Jeffrey K Aronson, Liane S Feldman, et al.
Lancet (London, England)|September 29, 2009
No surgical innovation without evaluation: the IDEAL recommendationsPeter McCulloch, Douglas G Altman, W Bruce Campbell, et al.
Pageof 15