Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Filters

Peter Tugwell

Showing results (61-70 of 719) with videos related to

Pageof 72
Sort By:
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology|June 15, 2014
Whither core outcome sets?Peter Tugwell, J André Knottnerus
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology|March 2, 2015
Transferability/generalizability deserves more attention in 'retest' studies in Diagnosis and PrognosisPeter Tugwell, J André Knottnerus
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology|May 20, 2019
Inadequate comparators produce misleading results - the importance of good comparison practiceJ André Knottnerus, Peter Tugwell
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology|April 20, 2011
Evidence-based design improvementJ André Knottnerus, Peter Tugwell
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology|June 22, 2016
Can we measure 'Sensationalisim' and 'Spin'?Peter Tugwell, J André Knottnerus
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology|February 25, 2012
Good publishing practiceJ André Knottnerus, Peter Tugwell
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology|June 15, 2016
We must further reduce the room-for-improvement gap in producing, reporting and summarizing clinical evidence for better careJ André Knottnerus, Peter Tugwell
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology|February 11, 2018
Comparative effectiveness research requires competitive effectivenessJ André Knottnerus, Peter Tugwell
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology|November 25, 2017
Current study design labels are confusing! Call for consensus on better terminology that clearly reflects specific featuresPeter Tugwell, J André Knottnerus
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology|November 6, 2018
Challenges in quantitative analysis need more attention, also in reportingJ André Knottnerus, Peter Tugwell
Pageof 72

Showing results (61-70 of 719) with videos related to

Sort By:
Pageof 72
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology|June 15, 2014
Whither core outcome sets?Peter Tugwell, J André Knottnerus
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology|March 2, 2015
Transferability/generalizability deserves more attention in 'retest' studies in Diagnosis and PrognosisPeter Tugwell, J André Knottnerus
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology|May 20, 2019
Inadequate comparators produce misleading results - the importance of good comparison practiceJ André Knottnerus, Peter Tugwell
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology|April 20, 2011
Evidence-based design improvementJ André Knottnerus, Peter Tugwell
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology|June 22, 2016
Can we measure 'Sensationalisim' and 'Spin'?Peter Tugwell, J André Knottnerus
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology|February 25, 2012
Good publishing practiceJ André Knottnerus, Peter Tugwell
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology|June 15, 2016
We must further reduce the room-for-improvement gap in producing, reporting and summarizing clinical evidence for better careJ André Knottnerus, Peter Tugwell
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology|February 11, 2018
Comparative effectiveness research requires competitive effectivenessJ André Knottnerus, Peter Tugwell
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology|November 25, 2017
Current study design labels are confusing! Call for consensus on better terminology that clearly reflects specific featuresPeter Tugwell, J André Knottnerus
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology|November 6, 2018
Challenges in quantitative analysis need more attention, also in reportingJ André Knottnerus, Peter Tugwell
Pageof 72