Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Filters

Phillip M Stevens

Showing results (21-30 of 41) with videos related to

Pageof 5
Sort By:
American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation|June 15, 2022
Assessment of Patient-Reported Physical Function in Persons With Upper Extremity Amputation: Comparison of Short Form InstrumentsLinda J Resnik, Phillip M Stevens, Pengsheng Ni, et al.
American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation|July 18, 2020
Assessment of a Nine-Item Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Upper Extremity Instrument Among Individuals With Upper Limb AmputationDwiesha L England, Taavy A Miller, Phillip M Stevens, et al.
Journal of Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies Engineering|June 23, 2022
OASIS 2: Mobility differences with specific prosthetic feet across procedure codesTaavy A Miller, James H Campbell, Dwiesha L England, et al.
Archives of Rehabilitation Research and Clinical Translation|June 14, 2023
Activity and Participation, Bimanual Function, and Prosthesis Satisfaction are Strong Predictors of General Well-Being Among Upper Limb Prosthesis UsersPhillip M Stevens, Dwiesha L England, Amy E Todd, et al.
Disability and Rehabilitation|May 19, 2023
Creating Adjusted Scores Targeting mobiLity Empowerment (CASTLE 1): determination of normative mobility scores after lower limb amputation for each year of adulthoodBretta L Fylstra, Dwiesha L England, Phillip M Stevens, et al.
American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation|December 5, 2021
Mobility Analysis of AmpuTees (MAAT 7): Normative Mobility Values for Lower Limb Prosthesis Users of Varying Age, Etiology, and Amputation LevelDwiesha L England, Taavy A Miller, Phillip M Stevens, et al.
Journal of Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies Engineering|July 18, 2022
Microprocessor feet improve prosthetic mobility and physical function relative to non-microprocessor feetEric L Weber, Phillip M Stevens, Dwiesha L England, et al.
The Journal of Craniofacial Surgery|August 13, 2021
Modified Cephalic Index Measured at Superior Levels of the Cranium Revealed Improved Correction With Helmet Therapy for Patients With Sagittal Suture CraniosynostosisLisa M Abernethy, Dwiesha L England, Ciera A Price, et al.
Prosthetics and Orthotics International|February 14, 2023
GGEM: Gender, Geography, and EMployment differences based on mobility levels among lower limb prosthesis users living in the United StatesDwiesha L England, Taavy A Miller, Phillip M Stevens, et al.
PM & R : the Journal of Injury, Function, and Rehabilitation|October 22, 2020
Understanding Changes in Physical Activity among Lower Limb Prosthesis Users: A COVID-19 Case SeriesAkshay S Tolani, Shane R Wurdeman, Bryce Billing, et al.
Pageof 5

Showing results (21-30 of 41) with videos related to

Sort By:
Pageof 5
American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation|June 15, 2022
Assessment of Patient-Reported Physical Function in Persons With Upper Extremity Amputation: Comparison of Short Form InstrumentsLinda J Resnik, Phillip M Stevens, Pengsheng Ni, et al.
American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation|July 18, 2020
Assessment of a Nine-Item Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Upper Extremity Instrument Among Individuals With Upper Limb AmputationDwiesha L England, Taavy A Miller, Phillip M Stevens, et al.
Journal of Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies Engineering|June 23, 2022
OASIS 2: Mobility differences with specific prosthetic feet across procedure codesTaavy A Miller, James H Campbell, Dwiesha L England, et al.
Archives of Rehabilitation Research and Clinical Translation|June 14, 2023
Activity and Participation, Bimanual Function, and Prosthesis Satisfaction are Strong Predictors of General Well-Being Among Upper Limb Prosthesis UsersPhillip M Stevens, Dwiesha L England, Amy E Todd, et al.
Disability and Rehabilitation|May 19, 2023
Creating Adjusted Scores Targeting mobiLity Empowerment (CASTLE 1): determination of normative mobility scores after lower limb amputation for each year of adulthoodBretta L Fylstra, Dwiesha L England, Phillip M Stevens, et al.
American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation|December 5, 2021
Mobility Analysis of AmpuTees (MAAT 7): Normative Mobility Values for Lower Limb Prosthesis Users of Varying Age, Etiology, and Amputation LevelDwiesha L England, Taavy A Miller, Phillip M Stevens, et al.
Journal of Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies Engineering|July 18, 2022
Microprocessor feet improve prosthetic mobility and physical function relative to non-microprocessor feetEric L Weber, Phillip M Stevens, Dwiesha L England, et al.
The Journal of Craniofacial Surgery|August 13, 2021
Modified Cephalic Index Measured at Superior Levels of the Cranium Revealed Improved Correction With Helmet Therapy for Patients With Sagittal Suture CraniosynostosisLisa M Abernethy, Dwiesha L England, Ciera A Price, et al.
Prosthetics and Orthotics International|February 14, 2023
GGEM: Gender, Geography, and EMployment differences based on mobility levels among lower limb prosthesis users living in the United StatesDwiesha L England, Taavy A Miller, Phillip M Stevens, et al.
PM & R : the Journal of Injury, Function, and Rehabilitation|October 22, 2020
Understanding Changes in Physical Activity among Lower Limb Prosthesis Users: A COVID-19 Case SeriesAkshay S Tolani, Shane R Wurdeman, Bryce Billing, et al.
Pageof 5