Showing results (21-30 of 159) with videos related to
Sort By:
Pageof 16
European Radiology|September 13, 2024
MRI characteristics predict risk of pathological upgrade in patients with ISUP grade group 1 prostate cancerM Boschheidgen, L Schimmöller, J P Radtke, et al.European Radiology|July 9, 2017
Hyoscine butylbromide significantly decreases motion artefacts and allows better delineation of anatomic structures in mp-MRI of the prostateT Ullrich, M Quentin, A K Schmaltz, et al.Urologia Internationalis|June 9, 2012
Evaluation of a structured report of functional prostate magnetic resonance imaging in patients with suspicion for prostate cancer or under active surveillanceM Quentin, D Blondin, J Klasen, et al.European Journal of Radiology|September 18, 2022
Impact of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in 1.5 T versus 3 T MRI for clinically significant prostate cancer detectionF Ziayee, L Schimmöller, D Blondin, et al.European Radiology|June 28, 2020
Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging can exclude prostate cancer progression in patients on active surveillance: a retrospective cohort studyT Ullrich, C Arsov, M Quentin, et al.European Journal of Radiology|April 1, 2019
Analysis of PI-RADS 4 cases: Management recommendations for negatively biopsied patientsT Ullrich, C Arsov, M Quentin, et al.European Radiology|November 8, 2021
MRI grading for the prediction of prostate cancer aggressivenessM Boschheidgen, L Schimmöller, C Arsov, et al.European Radiology|February 28, 2016
Targeted MRI-guided prostate biopsy: are two biopsy cores per MRI-lesion required?L Schimmöller, M Quentin, D Blondin, et al.European Journal of Radiology|June 7, 2017
Magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate at 1.5 versus 3.0T: A prospective comparison study of image qualityT Ullrich, M Quentin, C Oelers, et al.Pageof 16