Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Filters

R Austin Hicklin

Showing results (1-10 of 25) with videos related to

Pageof 3
Sort By:
Forensic Science International|September 13, 2014
On relative distortion in fingerprint comparisonNathan D Kalka, R Austin Hicklin
Forensic Science International|January 15, 2013
Assessing the clarity of friction ridge impressionsR Austin Hicklin, JoAnn Buscaglia, Maria Antonia Roberts
Forensic Science International|April 12, 2025
Accuracy and reproducibility of latent print decisions on comparisons from searches of an automated fingerprint identification systemR Austin Hicklin, Nicole Richetelli, AshLee Taylor, et al.
Forensic Science International|November 4, 2020
Why do latent fingerprint examiners differ in their conclusions?R Austin Hicklin, Bradford T Ulery, Madeline Ausdemore, et al.
Forensic Science International|January 2, 2015
Changes in latent fingerprint examiners' markup between analysis and comparisonBradford T Ulery, R Austin Hicklin, Maria Antonia Roberts, et al.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America|April 27, 2011
Accuracy and reliability of forensic latent fingerprint decisionsBradford T Ulery, R Austin Hicklin, Joann Buscaglia, et al.
Journal of Forensic Sciences|April 18, 2025
Inter-laboratory variation in interpretations, comparisons, and statistical analyses of DNA mixturesR Austin Hicklin, Nicole Richetelli, Robert A Bever, et al.
Data in Brief|June 14, 2016
Data on the interexaminer variation of minutia markup on latent fingerprintsBradford T Ulery, R Austin Hicklin, Maria Antonia Roberts, et al.
Plos One|November 6, 2014
Measuring what latent fingerprint examiners consider sufficient information for individualization determinationsBradford T Ulery, R Austin Hicklin, Maria Antonia Roberts, et al.
Forensic Science International|April 6, 2016
Interexaminer variation of minutia markup on latent fingerprintsBradford T Ulery, R Austin Hicklin, Maria Antonia Roberts, et al.
Pageof 3

Showing results (1-10 of 25) with videos related to

Sort By:
Pageof 3
Forensic Science International|September 13, 2014
On relative distortion in fingerprint comparisonNathan D Kalka, R Austin Hicklin
Forensic Science International|January 15, 2013
Assessing the clarity of friction ridge impressionsR Austin Hicklin, JoAnn Buscaglia, Maria Antonia Roberts
Forensic Science International|April 12, 2025
Accuracy and reproducibility of latent print decisions on comparisons from searches of an automated fingerprint identification systemR Austin Hicklin, Nicole Richetelli, AshLee Taylor, et al.
Forensic Science International|November 4, 2020
Why do latent fingerprint examiners differ in their conclusions?R Austin Hicklin, Bradford T Ulery, Madeline Ausdemore, et al.
Forensic Science International|January 2, 2015
Changes in latent fingerprint examiners' markup between analysis and comparisonBradford T Ulery, R Austin Hicklin, Maria Antonia Roberts, et al.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America|April 27, 2011
Accuracy and reliability of forensic latent fingerprint decisionsBradford T Ulery, R Austin Hicklin, Joann Buscaglia, et al.
Journal of Forensic Sciences|April 18, 2025
Inter-laboratory variation in interpretations, comparisons, and statistical analyses of DNA mixturesR Austin Hicklin, Nicole Richetelli, Robert A Bever, et al.
Data in Brief|June 14, 2016
Data on the interexaminer variation of minutia markup on latent fingerprintsBradford T Ulery, R Austin Hicklin, Maria Antonia Roberts, et al.
Plos One|November 6, 2014
Measuring what latent fingerprint examiners consider sufficient information for individualization determinationsBradford T Ulery, R Austin Hicklin, Maria Antonia Roberts, et al.
Forensic Science International|April 6, 2016
Interexaminer variation of minutia markup on latent fingerprintsBradford T Ulery, R Austin Hicklin, Maria Antonia Roberts, et al.
Pageof 3