Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Filters

R Edward Hendrick

Showing results (41-50 of 71) with videos related to

Pageof 8
Sort By:
AJR. American Journal of Roentgenology|September 24, 2014
Impact of computer-aided detection systems on radiologist accuracy with digital mammographyElodia B Cole, Zheng Zhang, Helga S Marques, et al.
International Journal of Cancer|November 6, 2003
Physical inactivity and percent breast density among Hispanic womenPilar López, Linda Van Horn, Laura A Colangelo, et al.
Academic Radiology|June 12, 2016
Radiation Dose to the Breast by 64-slice CT: Effects of Scanner Model and Study ProtocolZhihua Qi, Lisa C Lemen, Michael Lamba, et al.
Radiographics : a Review Publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc|February 7, 2008
Breast MR imaging artifacts: how to recognize and fix themJennifer A Harvey, R Edward Hendrick, Jennifer M Coll, et al.
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment|August 12, 2009
A prospective study of variability in mammographic density during the menstrual cycleMonica Morrow, Robert T Chatterton, Alfred W Rademaker, et al.
AJR. American Journal of Roentgenology|August 20, 2002
Clinical comparison of full-field digital mammography and screen-film mammography for detection of breast cancerJohn M Lewin, Carl J D'Orsi, R Edward Hendrick, et al.
Breast Cancer Research : BCR|June 16, 2012
Dual-energy contrast-enhanced digital mammography: initial clinical results of a multireader, multicase studyClarisse Dromain, Fabienne Thibault, Felix Diekmann, et al.
Journal of the National Cancer Institute|December 17, 2004
Accuracy of screening mammography interpretation by characteristics of radiologistsWilliam E Barlow, Chen Chi, Patricia A Carney, et al.
AJR. American Journal of Roentgenology|June 24, 2006
Digital and screen-film mammography: comparison of image acquisition and interpretation timesEric A Berns, R Edward Hendrick, Mariana Solari, et al.
AJR. American Journal of Roentgenology|January 23, 2010
Comparison of acquisition parameters and breast dose in digital mammography and screen-film mammography in the American College of Radiology Imaging Network digital mammographic imaging screening trialR Edward Hendrick, Etta D Pisano, Alice Averbukh, et al.
Pageof 8

Showing results (41-50 of 71) with videos related to

Sort By:
Pageof 8
AJR. American Journal of Roentgenology|September 24, 2014
Impact of computer-aided detection systems on radiologist accuracy with digital mammographyElodia B Cole, Zheng Zhang, Helga S Marques, et al.
International Journal of Cancer|November 6, 2003
Physical inactivity and percent breast density among Hispanic womenPilar López, Linda Van Horn, Laura A Colangelo, et al.
Academic Radiology|June 12, 2016
Radiation Dose to the Breast by 64-slice CT: Effects of Scanner Model and Study ProtocolZhihua Qi, Lisa C Lemen, Michael Lamba, et al.
Radiographics : a Review Publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc|February 7, 2008
Breast MR imaging artifacts: how to recognize and fix themJennifer A Harvey, R Edward Hendrick, Jennifer M Coll, et al.
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment|August 12, 2009
A prospective study of variability in mammographic density during the menstrual cycleMonica Morrow, Robert T Chatterton, Alfred W Rademaker, et al.
AJR. American Journal of Roentgenology|August 20, 2002
Clinical comparison of full-field digital mammography and screen-film mammography for detection of breast cancerJohn M Lewin, Carl J D'Orsi, R Edward Hendrick, et al.
Breast Cancer Research : BCR|June 16, 2012
Dual-energy contrast-enhanced digital mammography: initial clinical results of a multireader, multicase studyClarisse Dromain, Fabienne Thibault, Felix Diekmann, et al.
Journal of the National Cancer Institute|December 17, 2004
Accuracy of screening mammography interpretation by characteristics of radiologistsWilliam E Barlow, Chen Chi, Patricia A Carney, et al.
AJR. American Journal of Roentgenology|June 24, 2006
Digital and screen-film mammography: comparison of image acquisition and interpretation timesEric A Berns, R Edward Hendrick, Mariana Solari, et al.
AJR. American Journal of Roentgenology|January 23, 2010
Comparison of acquisition parameters and breast dose in digital mammography and screen-film mammography in the American College of Radiology Imaging Network digital mammographic imaging screening trialR Edward Hendrick, Etta D Pisano, Alice Averbukh, et al.
Pageof 8