Showing results (51-60 of 270) with videos related to

Sort By:
Pageof 27
BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.)|September 2, 1995
Probability of adverse events that have not yet occurred: a statistical reminderE Eypasch, R Lefering, C K Kum, et al.
Langenbecks Archiv Fur Chirurgie. Supplement. Kongressband. Deutsche Gesellschaft Fur Chirurgie. Kongress|January 1, 1997
[The trauma register of the 'Polytrauma' Committee of the German Society of Trauma Surgery as the basis for quality management in the management of severely injured patients]S Ruchholtz, D Nast-Kolb, C Waydhas, et al.
Langenbeck'S Archives of Surgery|March 27, 2007
How to improve satisfaction with hospital stay of severely injured patientsC Janssen, O Ommen, E Neugebauer, et al.
Shock (Augusta, Ga.)|February 28, 2001
Base deficit development and its prognostic significance in posttrauma critical illness: an analysis by the trauma registry of the Deutsche Gesellschaft für unfallchirurgieD Rixen, M Raum, B Bouillon, et al.
Langenbeck'S Archives of Surgery|June 6, 2008
Health services research in surgery--definitions, approaches and methodsO Ommen, C Janssen, H Pfaff, et al.
Der Unfallchirurg|January 5, 2002
[Constant Score and Neer Score. A comparison of score results and subjective patient satisfaction]M Tingart, H Bäthis, R Lefering, et al.
Surgical Endoscopy|August 1, 1996
Laparoscopic and conventional closure of perforated peptic ulcer. A comparisonM Miserez, E Eypasch, W Spangenberger, et al.
Inflammation Research : Official Journal of the European Histamine Research Society ... [Et Al.]|September 1, 2004
Limitations of score-based daily outcome predictions in the individual intensive care patient. An example of the RIAHDH algorithmR Lefering, B Wolfrum, H Wauer, et al.
The British Journal of Surgery|February 1, 1991
Conventional versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy and the randomized controlled trial. Cholecystectomy Study GroupE Neugebauer, H Troidl, W Spangenberger, et al.
Zentralblatt Fur Chirurgie|November 8, 2006
[Risk management--a new aspect of quality assessment in intensive care medicine: first results of an analysis of the DIVI's interdisciplinary quality assessment research group]R Stiletto, M Röthke, E Schäfer, et al.
Pageof 27