Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Filters

Richard I Frederick

Showing results (1-10 of 8) with videos related to

Pageof 1
Sort By:
Psychological Assessment|July 17, 2013
Rates of computational errors for scoring the SIRS primary scalesElizabeth A Tyner, Richard I Frederick
Assessment|February 23, 2007
On the interpretation of below-chance responding in forced-choice testsRichard I Frederick, F Michael Speed
The Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation|April 1, 2009
Evaluating constructs represented by symptom validity tests in forensic neuropsychological assessment of traumatic brain injuryRichard I Frederick, Stephen C Bowden
Behavioral Sciences & the Law|January 17, 2013
Classification accuracy of actuarial risk assessment instrumentsDaniel J Neller, Richard I Frederick
Assessment|October 8, 2008
The test validation summaryRichard I Frederick, Stephen C Bowden
Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology : the Official Journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists|September 20, 2006
Improving the clinical utility of the SIRS cognitive items: preliminary reliability, validity, and normative data in pretrial and clinical samplesTimothy F Wynkoop, Richard I Frederick, Michelle Hoy
Psychological Assessment|September 7, 2006
Evaluating the latent structure of the MMPI-2 F(p) scale in a forensic sample: a taxometric analysisDavid R Strong, David M Glassmire, Richard I Frederick, et al.
Psychological Assessment|February 2, 2018
Comparability of Structured Interview of Reported Symptoms (SIRS) and Structured Interview of Reported Symptoms-Second Edition (SIRS-2) classifications with external response bias criteriaJessica L Tylicki, Dustin B Wygant, Anthony M Tarescavage, et al.
Pageof 1

Showing results (1-10 of 8) with videos related to

Sort By:
Pageof 1
Psychological Assessment|July 17, 2013
Rates of computational errors for scoring the SIRS primary scalesElizabeth A Tyner, Richard I Frederick
Assessment|February 23, 2007
On the interpretation of below-chance responding in forced-choice testsRichard I Frederick, F Michael Speed
The Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation|April 1, 2009
Evaluating constructs represented by symptom validity tests in forensic neuropsychological assessment of traumatic brain injuryRichard I Frederick, Stephen C Bowden
Behavioral Sciences & the Law|January 17, 2013
Classification accuracy of actuarial risk assessment instrumentsDaniel J Neller, Richard I Frederick
Assessment|October 8, 2008
The test validation summaryRichard I Frederick, Stephen C Bowden
Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology : the Official Journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists|September 20, 2006
Improving the clinical utility of the SIRS cognitive items: preliminary reliability, validity, and normative data in pretrial and clinical samplesTimothy F Wynkoop, Richard I Frederick, Michelle Hoy
Psychological Assessment|September 7, 2006
Evaluating the latent structure of the MMPI-2 F(p) scale in a forensic sample: a taxometric analysisDavid R Strong, David M Glassmire, Richard I Frederick, et al.
Psychological Assessment|February 2, 2018
Comparability of Structured Interview of Reported Symptoms (SIRS) and Structured Interview of Reported Symptoms-Second Edition (SIRS-2) classifications with external response bias criteriaJessica L Tylicki, Dustin B Wygant, Anthony M Tarescavage, et al.
Pageof 1