Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Filters

Rink Hoekstra

Showing results (11-20 of 26) with videos related to

Pageof 3
Sort By:
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review|December 2, 2015
Continued misinterpretation of confidence intervals: response to Miller and UlrichRichard D Morey, Rink Hoekstra, Jeffrey N Rouder, et al.
Scientific Reports|May 27, 2024
Comparing researchers' degree of dichotomous thinking using frequentist versus Bayesian null hypothesis testingJasmine Muradchanian, Rink Hoekstra, Henk Kiers, et al.
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review|January 15, 2014
Robust misinterpretation of confidence intervalsRink Hoekstra, Richard D Morey, Jeffrey N Rouder, et al.
Experimental Psychology|June 16, 2018
Do Researchers Anchor Their Beliefs on the Outcome of an Initial Study?Anja Franziska Ernst, Rink Hoekstra, Eric-Jan Wagenmakers, et al.
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review|October 10, 2015
The fallacy of placing confidence in confidence intervalsRichard D Morey, Rink Hoekstra, Jeffrey N Rouder, et al.
Psychotherapy Research : Journal of the Society for Psychotherapy Research|April 20, 2025
When theory and therapy part ways-A scoping review of the science-to-practice gapNina R Schwarzbach, Rink Hoekstra, Anika Poppe, et al.
Royal Society Open Science|May 21, 2020
The effect of preregistration on trust in empirical research findings: results of a registered reportSarahanne M Field, E-J Wagenmakers, Henk A L Kiers, et al.
Nature Human Behaviour|January 29, 2020
Discussion points for Bayesian inferenceBalazs Aczel, Rink Hoekstra, Andrew Gelman, et al.
Nature Human Behaviour|November 12, 2021
Seven steps toward more transparency in statistical practiceEric-Jan Wagenmakers, Alexandra Sarafoglou, Sil Aarts, et al.
Royal Society Open Science|February 25, 2016
The Peer Reviewers' Openness Initiative: incentivizing open research practices through peer reviewRichard D Morey, Christopher D Chambers, Peter J Etchells, et al.
Pageof 3

Showing results (11-20 of 26) with videos related to

Sort By:
Pageof 3
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review|December 2, 2015
Continued misinterpretation of confidence intervals: response to Miller and UlrichRichard D Morey, Rink Hoekstra, Jeffrey N Rouder, et al.
Scientific Reports|May 27, 2024
Comparing researchers' degree of dichotomous thinking using frequentist versus Bayesian null hypothesis testingJasmine Muradchanian, Rink Hoekstra, Henk Kiers, et al.
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review|January 15, 2014
Robust misinterpretation of confidence intervalsRink Hoekstra, Richard D Morey, Jeffrey N Rouder, et al.
Experimental Psychology|June 16, 2018
Do Researchers Anchor Their Beliefs on the Outcome of an Initial Study?Anja Franziska Ernst, Rink Hoekstra, Eric-Jan Wagenmakers, et al.
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review|October 10, 2015
The fallacy of placing confidence in confidence intervalsRichard D Morey, Rink Hoekstra, Jeffrey N Rouder, et al.
Psychotherapy Research : Journal of the Society for Psychotherapy Research|April 20, 2025
When theory and therapy part ways-A scoping review of the science-to-practice gapNina R Schwarzbach, Rink Hoekstra, Anika Poppe, et al.
Royal Society Open Science|May 21, 2020
The effect of preregistration on trust in empirical research findings: results of a registered reportSarahanne M Field, E-J Wagenmakers, Henk A L Kiers, et al.
Nature Human Behaviour|January 29, 2020
Discussion points for Bayesian inferenceBalazs Aczel, Rink Hoekstra, Andrew Gelman, et al.
Nature Human Behaviour|November 12, 2021
Seven steps toward more transparency in statistical practiceEric-Jan Wagenmakers, Alexandra Sarafoglou, Sil Aarts, et al.
Royal Society Open Science|February 25, 2016
The Peer Reviewers' Openness Initiative: incentivizing open research practices through peer reviewRichard D Morey, Christopher D Chambers, Peter J Etchells, et al.
Pageof 3