Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Filters

Robert M Ross

Showing results (21-30 of 67) with videos related to

Pageof 7
Sort By:
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review|February 23, 2017
Dunning-Kruger effects in reasoning: Theoretical implications of the failure to recognize incompetenceGordon Pennycook, Robert M Ross, Derek J Koehler, et al.
Memory & Cognition|August 28, 2021
Analytic thinking predicts accuracy ratings and willingness to share COVID-19 misinformation in AustraliaMatthew S Nurse, Robert M Ross, Ozan Isler, et al.
Clinical Psychology Review|January 17, 2024
Construct validity evidence reporting practices for the Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test: A systematic scoping reviewWendy C Higgins, David M Kaplan, Eliane Deschrijver, et al.
Plos One|April 8, 2016
Atheists and Agnostics Are More Reflective than Religious Believers: Four Empirical Studies and a Meta-AnalysisGordon Pennycook, Robert M Ross, Derek J Koehler, et al.
Plos One|April 22, 2017
Correction: Atheists and Agnostics Are More Reflective than Religious Believers: Four Empirical Studies and a Meta-AnalysisGordon Pennycook, Robert M Ross, Derek J Koehler, et al.
Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews|February 14, 2023
Three threats to the validity of the Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test: A commentary onWendy C Higgins, Robert M Ross, Vince Polito, et al.
Clinical Psychology Review|December 19, 2024
Why most research based on the Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test is unsubstantiated and uninterpretable: A response to Murphy and Hall (2024)Wendy C Higgins, David M Kaplan, Eliane Deschrijver, et al.
BMC Pulmonary Medicine|May 28, 2010
The six minute walk test accurately estimates mean peak oxygen uptakeRobert M Ross, Jayasimha N Murthy, Istvan D Wollak, et al.
Cognitive Neuropsychiatry|June 25, 2016
Analytic cognitive style, not delusional ideation, predicts data gathering in a large beads task studyRobert M Ross, Gordon Pennycook, Ryan McKay, et al.
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science|January 23, 2026
Rethinking psychological measurement: Validity potential versus realised validityWendy C Higgins, David M Kaplan, Alexander J Gillett, et al.
Pageof 7

Showing results (21-30 of 67) with videos related to

Sort By:
Pageof 7
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review|February 23, 2017
Dunning-Kruger effects in reasoning: Theoretical implications of the failure to recognize incompetenceGordon Pennycook, Robert M Ross, Derek J Koehler, et al.
Memory & Cognition|August 28, 2021
Analytic thinking predicts accuracy ratings and willingness to share COVID-19 misinformation in AustraliaMatthew S Nurse, Robert M Ross, Ozan Isler, et al.
Clinical Psychology Review|January 17, 2024
Construct validity evidence reporting practices for the Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test: A systematic scoping reviewWendy C Higgins, David M Kaplan, Eliane Deschrijver, et al.
Plos One|April 8, 2016
Atheists and Agnostics Are More Reflective than Religious Believers: Four Empirical Studies and a Meta-AnalysisGordon Pennycook, Robert M Ross, Derek J Koehler, et al.
Plos One|April 22, 2017
Correction: Atheists and Agnostics Are More Reflective than Religious Believers: Four Empirical Studies and a Meta-AnalysisGordon Pennycook, Robert M Ross, Derek J Koehler, et al.
Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews|February 14, 2023
Three threats to the validity of the Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test: A commentary onWendy C Higgins, Robert M Ross, Vince Polito, et al.
Clinical Psychology Review|December 19, 2024
Why most research based on the Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test is unsubstantiated and uninterpretable: A response to Murphy and Hall (2024)Wendy C Higgins, David M Kaplan, Eliane Deschrijver, et al.
BMC Pulmonary Medicine|May 28, 2010
The six minute walk test accurately estimates mean peak oxygen uptakeRobert M Ross, Jayasimha N Murthy, Istvan D Wollak, et al.
Cognitive Neuropsychiatry|June 25, 2016
Analytic cognitive style, not delusional ideation, predicts data gathering in a large beads task studyRobert M Ross, Gordon Pennycook, Ryan McKay, et al.
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science|January 23, 2026
Rethinking psychological measurement: Validity potential versus realised validityWendy C Higgins, David M Kaplan, Alexander J Gillett, et al.
Pageof 7