Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Filters

S D Frankel

Showing results (1-10 of 11) with videos related to

Pageof 2
Sort By:
Magnetic Resonance Imaging Clinics of North America|November 1, 1994
Imaging techniques for breast MR imagingN M Hylton, S D Frankel
Radiology|March 1, 1997
Morphologic criteria for interpreting abnormalities seen at breast MR imagingS D Frankel, E A Sickles
Radiologic Clinics of North America|September 1, 1993
The ovary. Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imagingK A Occhipinti, S D Frankel, H Hricak
AJR. American Journal of Roentgenology|March 4, 2000
Efficacy of step-oblique mammography for confirmation and localization of densities seen on only one standard mammographic viewK L Pearson, E A Sickles, S D Frankel, et al.
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery|November 1, 1994
MRI of a silicone breast implant surrounded by an enlarging hemorrhagic collectionS D Frankel, K A Occhipinti, L Kaufman, et al.
Radiology|December 1, 1995
Ovarian cancer: staging with CT and MR imagingR Forstner, H Hricak, K A Occhipinti, et al.
Journal of the National Cancer Institute|December 5, 1998
Variability and accuracy in mammographic interpretation using the American College of Radiology Breast Imaging Reporting and Data SystemK Kerlikowske, D Grady, J Barclay, et al.
AJR. American Journal of Roentgenology|May 1, 1995
Initial versus subsequent screening mammography: comparison of findings and their prognostic significanceS D Frankel, E A Sickles, B N Curpen, et al.
AJR. American Journal of Roentgenology|May 1, 1995
The comparative value of mammographic screening for women 40-49 years old versus women 50-64 years oldB N Curpen, E A Sickles, R A Sollitto, et al.
Radiology|January 1, 1995
Clinical efficacy of mammographic screening in the elderlyR M Faulk, E A Sickles, R A Sollitto, et al.
Pageof 2

Showing results (1-10 of 11) with videos related to

Sort By:
Pageof 2
Magnetic Resonance Imaging Clinics of North America|November 1, 1994
Imaging techniques for breast MR imagingN M Hylton, S D Frankel
Radiology|March 1, 1997
Morphologic criteria for interpreting abnormalities seen at breast MR imagingS D Frankel, E A Sickles
Radiologic Clinics of North America|September 1, 1993
The ovary. Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imagingK A Occhipinti, S D Frankel, H Hricak
AJR. American Journal of Roentgenology|March 4, 2000
Efficacy of step-oblique mammography for confirmation and localization of densities seen on only one standard mammographic viewK L Pearson, E A Sickles, S D Frankel, et al.
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery|November 1, 1994
MRI of a silicone breast implant surrounded by an enlarging hemorrhagic collectionS D Frankel, K A Occhipinti, L Kaufman, et al.
Radiology|December 1, 1995
Ovarian cancer: staging with CT and MR imagingR Forstner, H Hricak, K A Occhipinti, et al.
Journal of the National Cancer Institute|December 5, 1998
Variability and accuracy in mammographic interpretation using the American College of Radiology Breast Imaging Reporting and Data SystemK Kerlikowske, D Grady, J Barclay, et al.
AJR. American Journal of Roentgenology|May 1, 1995
Initial versus subsequent screening mammography: comparison of findings and their prognostic significanceS D Frankel, E A Sickles, B N Curpen, et al.
AJR. American Journal of Roentgenology|May 1, 1995
The comparative value of mammographic screening for women 40-49 years old versus women 50-64 years oldB N Curpen, E A Sickles, R A Sollitto, et al.
Radiology|January 1, 1995
Clinical efficacy of mammographic screening in the elderlyR M Faulk, E A Sickles, R A Sollitto, et al.
Pageof 2