Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Filters

S H Ominsky

Showing results (11-20 of 21) with videos related to

Pageof 3
Sort By:
Cancer|August 1, 1979
The thorax as the initial site for systemic relapse in malignant melanoma: a prospective survey of 324 patientsM A Gromet, S H Ominsky, W L Epstein, et al.
AJR. American Journal of Roentgenology|December 1, 1986
Baseline screening mammography: one vs two views per breastE A Sickles, W N Weber, H B Galvin, et al.
Radiology|May 1, 1990
Medical audit of a rapid-throughput mammography screening practice: methodology and results of 27,114 examinationsE A Sickles, S H Ominsky, R A Sollitto, et al.
Radiology|July 1, 1986
Mammographic screening: how to operate successfully at low costE A Sickles, W N Weber, H B Galvin, et al.
Cancer|October 1, 1987
Low cost mammography screening. Practical considerations with emphasis on mobile operationE A Sickles, W N Weber, H B Galvin, et al.
Journal of the National Cancer Institute|December 5, 1998
Variability and accuracy in mammographic interpretation using the American College of Radiology Breast Imaging Reporting and Data SystemK Kerlikowske, D Grady, J Barclay, et al.
Radiology|January 1, 1995
Clinical efficacy of mammographic screening in the elderlyR M Faulk, E A Sickles, R A Sollitto, et al.
AJR. American Journal of Roentgenology|May 1, 1995
Initial versus subsequent screening mammography: comparison of findings and their prognostic significanceS D Frankel, E A Sickles, B N Curpen, et al.
AJR. American Journal of Roentgenology|May 1, 1995
The comparative value of mammographic screening for women 40-49 years old versus women 50-64 years oldB N Curpen, E A Sickles, R A Sollitto, et al.
Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology|June 1, 1980
The radiographic appearance of erosive duodenitis: a radiographic-endoscopic correlative studyF C Kunstlinger, R F Thoeni, J H Grendell, et al.
Pageof 3

Showing results (11-20 of 21) with videos related to

Sort By:
Pageof 3
Cancer|August 1, 1979
The thorax as the initial site for systemic relapse in malignant melanoma: a prospective survey of 324 patientsM A Gromet, S H Ominsky, W L Epstein, et al.
AJR. American Journal of Roentgenology|December 1, 1986
Baseline screening mammography: one vs two views per breastE A Sickles, W N Weber, H B Galvin, et al.
Radiology|May 1, 1990
Medical audit of a rapid-throughput mammography screening practice: methodology and results of 27,114 examinationsE A Sickles, S H Ominsky, R A Sollitto, et al.
Radiology|July 1, 1986
Mammographic screening: how to operate successfully at low costE A Sickles, W N Weber, H B Galvin, et al.
Cancer|October 1, 1987
Low cost mammography screening. Practical considerations with emphasis on mobile operationE A Sickles, W N Weber, H B Galvin, et al.
Journal of the National Cancer Institute|December 5, 1998
Variability and accuracy in mammographic interpretation using the American College of Radiology Breast Imaging Reporting and Data SystemK Kerlikowske, D Grady, J Barclay, et al.
Radiology|January 1, 1995
Clinical efficacy of mammographic screening in the elderlyR M Faulk, E A Sickles, R A Sollitto, et al.
AJR. American Journal of Roentgenology|May 1, 1995
Initial versus subsequent screening mammography: comparison of findings and their prognostic significanceS D Frankel, E A Sickles, B N Curpen, et al.
AJR. American Journal of Roentgenology|May 1, 1995
The comparative value of mammographic screening for women 40-49 years old versus women 50-64 years oldB N Curpen, E A Sickles, R A Sollitto, et al.
Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology|June 1, 1980
The radiographic appearance of erosive duodenitis: a radiographic-endoscopic correlative studyF C Kunstlinger, R F Thoeni, J H Grendell, et al.
Pageof 3