Search research articles
Contact Us
Filters
Showing results (1-10 of 16) with videos related to
Page
of 2
Sort By:
Research Integrity and Peer Review
|
July 10, 2023
Publisher Correction: Fighting reviewer fatigue or amplifying bias? Considerations and recommendations for use of ChatGPT and other large language models in scholarly peer review
Mohammad Hosseini, Serge P J M Horbach
Genome Biology
|
May 5, 2020
What are innovations in peer review and editorial assessment for?
Willem Halffman, Serge P J M Horbach
Research Square
|
March 3, 2023
Fighting reviewer fatigue or amplifying bias? Considerations and recommendations for use of ChatGPT and other Large Language Models in scholarly peer review
Mohammad Hosseini, Serge P J M Horbach
Plos One
|
October 13, 2017
The ghosts of HeLa: How cell line misidentification contaminates the scientific literature
Serge P J M Horbach, Willem Halffman
Research Integrity and Peer Review
|
August 11, 2020
Innovating editorial practices: academic publishers at work
Serge P J M Horbach, Willem Halffman
Research Integrity and Peer Review
|
May 17, 2023
Fighting reviewer fatigue or amplifying bias? Considerations and recommendations for use of ChatGPT and other large language models in scholarly peer review
Mohammad Hosseini, Serge P J M Horbach
Acta Orthopaedica
|
July 18, 2025
Changing peer review practices: transforming roles and future challenges
Serge P J M Horbach, Søren Overgaard
Royal Society Open Science
|
October 31, 2022
Research funders should be more transparent: a plea for open applications
Serge P J M Horbach, Joeri K Tijdink, Lex Bouter
Plos Biology
|
October 4, 2023
Open peer review urgently requires evidence: A call to action
Tony Ross-Hellauer, Lex M Bouter, Serge P J M Horbach
Quantitative Science Studies
|
March 24, 2025
Open Science at the generative AI turn: An exploratory analysis of challenges and opportunities
Mohammad Hosseini, Serge P J M Horbach, Kristi Holmes, et al.
Page
of 2
Search research articles
Search
Showing results (1-10 of 16) with videos related to
Sort By:
Page
of 2
Research Integrity and Peer Review
|
July 10, 2023
Publisher Correction: Fighting reviewer fatigue or amplifying bias? Considerations and recommendations for use of ChatGPT and other large language models in scholarly peer review
Mohammad Hosseini, Serge P J M Horbach
Genome Biology
|
May 5, 2020
What are innovations in peer review and editorial assessment for?
Willem Halffman, Serge P J M Horbach
Research Square
|
March 3, 2023
Fighting reviewer fatigue or amplifying bias? Considerations and recommendations for use of ChatGPT and other Large Language Models in scholarly peer review
Mohammad Hosseini, Serge P J M Horbach
Plos One
|
October 13, 2017
The ghosts of HeLa: How cell line misidentification contaminates the scientific literature
Serge P J M Horbach, Willem Halffman
Research Integrity and Peer Review
|
August 11, 2020
Innovating editorial practices: academic publishers at work
Serge P J M Horbach, Willem Halffman
Research Integrity and Peer Review
|
May 17, 2023
Fighting reviewer fatigue or amplifying bias? Considerations and recommendations for use of ChatGPT and other large language models in scholarly peer review
Mohammad Hosseini, Serge P J M Horbach
Acta Orthopaedica
|
July 18, 2025
Changing peer review practices: transforming roles and future challenges
Serge P J M Horbach, Søren Overgaard
Royal Society Open Science
|
October 31, 2022
Research funders should be more transparent: a plea for open applications
Serge P J M Horbach, Joeri K Tijdink, Lex Bouter
Plos Biology
|
October 4, 2023
Open peer review urgently requires evidence: A call to action
Tony Ross-Hellauer, Lex M Bouter, Serge P J M Horbach
Quantitative Science Studies
|
March 24, 2025
Open Science at the generative AI turn: An exploratory analysis of challenges and opportunities
Mohammad Hosseini, Serge P J M Horbach, Kristi Holmes, et al.
Page
of 2