Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Filters

Solveig Hofvind

Showing results (201-210 of 229) with videos related to

Pageof 23
Sort By:
Medical Decision Making : an International Journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making|July 30, 2024
Modeling Radiologists' Assessments to Explore Pairing Strategies for Optimized Double Reading of Screening MammogramsJessie J J Gommers, Craig K Abbey, Fredrik Strand, et al.
Lancet (London, England)|January 31, 2026
Interval cancer, sensitivity, and specificity comparing AI-supported mammography screening with standard double reading without AI in the MASAI study: a randomised, controlled, non-inferiority, single-blinded, population-based, screening-accuracy trialJessie Gommers, Veronica Hernström, Viktoria Josefsson, et al.
European Radiology|April 5, 2013
Prospective trial comparing full-field digital mammography (FFDM) versus combined FFDM and tomosynthesis in a population-based screening programme using independent double reading with arbitrationPer Skaane, Andriy I Bandos, Randi Gullien, et al.
Radiology|December 11, 2019
Interval and Consecutive Round Breast Cancer after Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and Synthetic 2D Mammography versus Standard 2D Digital Mammography in BreastScreen NorwayTone Hovda, Åsne S Holen, Kristina Lång, et al.
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention : a Publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, Cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology|June 22, 2018
Volumetric Mammographic Density, Age-Related Decline, and Breast Cancer Risk Factors in a National Breast Cancer Screening ProgramKirsti Vik Hjerkind, Merete Ellingjord-Dale, Anna L V Johansson, et al.
Radiology. Artificial Intelligence|February 5, 2025
Performance of Two Deep Learning-based AI Models for Breast Cancer Detection and Localization on Screening Mammograms from BreastScreen NorwayMarit A Martiniussen, Marthe Larsen, Tone Hovda, et al.
Insights Into Imaging|February 9, 2024
Digital breast tomosynthesis in mammographic screening: false negative cancer cases in the To-Be 1 trialNataliia Moshina, Axel Gräwingholt, Kristina Lång, et al.
European Radiology|March 26, 2024
AI performance by mammographic density in a retrospective cohort study of 99,489 participants in BreastScreen NorwayMarie Burns Bergan, Marthe Larsen, Nataliia Moshina, et al.
Preventive Medicine Reports|December 20, 2023
Differences in mammography screening attendance among non-Western immigrants in Denmark, Finland, Iceland and NorwaySisse Helle Njor, Sirpa Heinävaara, Hrefna Stefansdóttir, et al.
Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR|November 10, 2023
Artificial Intelligence-Driven Mammography-Based Future Breast Cancer Risk Prediction: A Systematic ReviewCody M Schopf, Ojas A Ramwala, Kathryn P Lowry, et al.
Pageof 23

Showing results (201-210 of 229) with videos related to

Sort By:
Pageof 23
Medical Decision Making : an International Journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making|July 30, 2024
Modeling Radiologists' Assessments to Explore Pairing Strategies for Optimized Double Reading of Screening MammogramsJessie J J Gommers, Craig K Abbey, Fredrik Strand, et al.
Lancet (London, England)|January 31, 2026
Interval cancer, sensitivity, and specificity comparing AI-supported mammography screening with standard double reading without AI in the MASAI study: a randomised, controlled, non-inferiority, single-blinded, population-based, screening-accuracy trialJessie Gommers, Veronica Hernström, Viktoria Josefsson, et al.
European Radiology|April 5, 2013
Prospective trial comparing full-field digital mammography (FFDM) versus combined FFDM and tomosynthesis in a population-based screening programme using independent double reading with arbitrationPer Skaane, Andriy I Bandos, Randi Gullien, et al.
Radiology|December 11, 2019
Interval and Consecutive Round Breast Cancer after Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and Synthetic 2D Mammography versus Standard 2D Digital Mammography in BreastScreen NorwayTone Hovda, Åsne S Holen, Kristina Lång, et al.
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention : a Publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, Cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology|June 22, 2018
Volumetric Mammographic Density, Age-Related Decline, and Breast Cancer Risk Factors in a National Breast Cancer Screening ProgramKirsti Vik Hjerkind, Merete Ellingjord-Dale, Anna L V Johansson, et al.
Radiology. Artificial Intelligence|February 5, 2025
Performance of Two Deep Learning-based AI Models for Breast Cancer Detection and Localization on Screening Mammograms from BreastScreen NorwayMarit A Martiniussen, Marthe Larsen, Tone Hovda, et al.
Insights Into Imaging|February 9, 2024
Digital breast tomosynthesis in mammographic screening: false negative cancer cases in the To-Be 1 trialNataliia Moshina, Axel Gräwingholt, Kristina Lång, et al.
European Radiology|March 26, 2024
AI performance by mammographic density in a retrospective cohort study of 99,489 participants in BreastScreen NorwayMarie Burns Bergan, Marthe Larsen, Nataliia Moshina, et al.
Preventive Medicine Reports|December 20, 2023
Differences in mammography screening attendance among non-Western immigrants in Denmark, Finland, Iceland and NorwaySisse Helle Njor, Sirpa Heinävaara, Hrefna Stefansdóttir, et al.
Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR|November 10, 2023
Artificial Intelligence-Driven Mammography-Based Future Breast Cancer Risk Prediction: A Systematic ReviewCody M Schopf, Ojas A Ramwala, Kathryn P Lowry, et al.
Pageof 23