Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Filters

Stephen Burgess

Showing results (1-10 of 449) with videos related to

Pageof 45
Sort By:
Alzheimer'S & Dementia : the Journal of the Alzheimer'S Association|August 21, 2022
"C-reactive protein levels and risk of dementia": Subgroup analyses in Mendelian randomization are likely to be misleadingStephen Burgess
Statistics in Medicine|June 5, 2013
Identifying the odds ratio estimated by a two-stage instrumental variable analysis with a logistic regression modelStephen Burgess,
American Journal of Epidemiology|August 2, 2012
Re: "credible mendelian randomization studies: approaches for evaluating the instrumental variable assumptions"Stephen Burgess
International Journal of Epidemiology|March 11, 2014
Sample size and power calculations in Mendelian randomization with a single instrumental variable and a binary outcomeStephen Burgess
European Journal of Epidemiology|June 26, 2018
What indeed can be tested with an instrumental variable?Stephen Burgess
Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.)|April 4, 2015
Commentary: Consistency and collapsibility: are they crucial for instrumental variable analysis with a survival outcome in mendelian randomization?Stephen Burgess
European Journal of Epidemiology|May 24, 2024
Towards more reliable non-linear mendelian randomization investigationsStephen Burgess
The Lancet. Diabetes & Endocrinology|January 20, 2016
Plasma urate and coronary heart disease: fingerprint match, but no smoking gunStephen Burgess
Human Heredity|August 31, 2023
Violation of the Constant Genetic Effect Assumption Can Result in Biased Estimates for Non-Linear Mendelian RandomizationStephen Burgess
Plos Medicine|February 3, 2022
The evolution of mendelian randomization for investigating drug effectsDipender Gill, Stephen Burgess
Pageof 45

Showing results (1-10 of 449) with videos related to

Sort By:
Pageof 45
Alzheimer'S & Dementia : the Journal of the Alzheimer'S Association|August 21, 2022
"C-reactive protein levels and risk of dementia": Subgroup analyses in Mendelian randomization are likely to be misleadingStephen Burgess
Statistics in Medicine|June 5, 2013
Identifying the odds ratio estimated by a two-stage instrumental variable analysis with a logistic regression modelStephen Burgess,
American Journal of Epidemiology|August 2, 2012
Re: "credible mendelian randomization studies: approaches for evaluating the instrumental variable assumptions"Stephen Burgess
International Journal of Epidemiology|March 11, 2014
Sample size and power calculations in Mendelian randomization with a single instrumental variable and a binary outcomeStephen Burgess
European Journal of Epidemiology|June 26, 2018
What indeed can be tested with an instrumental variable?Stephen Burgess
Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.)|April 4, 2015
Commentary: Consistency and collapsibility: are they crucial for instrumental variable analysis with a survival outcome in mendelian randomization?Stephen Burgess
European Journal of Epidemiology|May 24, 2024
Towards more reliable non-linear mendelian randomization investigationsStephen Burgess
The Lancet. Diabetes & Endocrinology|January 20, 2016
Plasma urate and coronary heart disease: fingerprint match, but no smoking gunStephen Burgess
Human Heredity|August 31, 2023
Violation of the Constant Genetic Effect Assumption Can Result in Biased Estimates for Non-Linear Mendelian RandomizationStephen Burgess
Plos Medicine|February 3, 2022
The evolution of mendelian randomization for investigating drug effectsDipender Gill, Stephen Burgess
Pageof 45