Search research articles
Contact Us
Filters
Showing results (1-10 of 133) with videos related to
Page
of 14
Sort By:
Journal of Clinical Nursing
|
May 25, 2010
Therapist effects in randomised controlled trials: what to do about them
Stephen J Walters
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
|
May 27, 2004
Sample size and power estimation for studies with health related quality of life outcomes: a comparison of four methods using the SF-36
Stephen J Walters
Pharmaceutical Statistics
|
April 18, 2008
Consultants' forum: should post hoc sample size calculations be done?
Stephen J Walters
Biosensors & Bioelectronics
|
January 8, 2004
Transition metal half-sandwich complexes as redox mediators to glucose oxidase
Nigel J Forrow, Stephen J Walters
Statistical Methods in Medical Research
|
February 22, 2013
Estimating effect sizes for health-related quality of life outcomes
Steven A Julious, Stephen J Walters
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
|
May 10, 2003
What is the relationship between the minimally important difference and health state utility values? The case of the SF-6D
Stephen J Walters, John E Brazier
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
|
December 14, 2004
The use of bootstrap methods for analysing Health-Related Quality of Life outcomes (particularly the SF-36)
Stephen J Walters, Michael J Campbell
Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research
|
October 8, 2009
Update on the use of osteoarthritis-specific outcome measures
Stephen J Walters, Myfanwy Lloyd-Jones
Quality of Life Research : an International Journal of Quality of Life Aspects of Treatment, Care and Rehabilitation
|
August 23, 2005
Comparison of the minimally important difference for two health state utility measures: EQ-5D and SF-6D
Stephen J Walters, John E Brazier
Statistics in Medicine
|
December 1, 2004
The use of bootstrap methods for estimating sample size and analysing health-related quality of life outcomes
Stephen J Walters, Michael J Campbell
Page
of 14
Search research articles
Search
Showing results (1-10 of 133) with videos related to
Sort By:
Page
of 14
Journal of Clinical Nursing
|
May 25, 2010
Therapist effects in randomised controlled trials: what to do about them
Stephen J Walters
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
|
May 27, 2004
Sample size and power estimation for studies with health related quality of life outcomes: a comparison of four methods using the SF-36
Stephen J Walters
Pharmaceutical Statistics
|
April 18, 2008
Consultants' forum: should post hoc sample size calculations be done?
Stephen J Walters
Biosensors & Bioelectronics
|
January 8, 2004
Transition metal half-sandwich complexes as redox mediators to glucose oxidase
Nigel J Forrow, Stephen J Walters
Statistical Methods in Medical Research
|
February 22, 2013
Estimating effect sizes for health-related quality of life outcomes
Steven A Julious, Stephen J Walters
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
|
May 10, 2003
What is the relationship between the minimally important difference and health state utility values? The case of the SF-6D
Stephen J Walters, John E Brazier
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
|
December 14, 2004
The use of bootstrap methods for analysing Health-Related Quality of Life outcomes (particularly the SF-36)
Stephen J Walters, Michael J Campbell
Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research
|
October 8, 2009
Update on the use of osteoarthritis-specific outcome measures
Stephen J Walters, Myfanwy Lloyd-Jones
Quality of Life Research : an International Journal of Quality of Life Aspects of Treatment, Care and Rehabilitation
|
August 23, 2005
Comparison of the minimally important difference for two health state utility measures: EQ-5D and SF-6D
Stephen J Walters, John E Brazier
Statistics in Medicine
|
December 1, 2004
The use of bootstrap methods for estimating sample size and analysing health-related quality of life outcomes
Stephen J Walters, Michael J Campbell
Page
of 14