Showing results (1-10 of 13) with videos related to
Sort By:
Pageof 2
Accountability in Research|January 28, 2025
It takes two flints to start a fire: A focus group study into PhD supervision for responsible researchTamarinde HavenBritish Journal of Clinical Pharmacology|August 20, 2022
Preclinical efficacy in investigator's brochures: Stakeholders' views on measures to improve completeness and robustnessMartin Haslberger, Susanne Gabriele Schorr, Daniel Strech, et al.Accountability in Research|April 27, 2022
Superb supervision: A pilot study on training supervisors to convey responsible research practices onto their PhD candidatesTamarinde Haven, Lex Bouter, Louise Mennen, et al.Research Integrity and Peer Review|August 30, 2019
Value pluralism in research integrityRik Peels, Jeroen de Ridder, Tamarinde Haven, et al.BMC Research Notes|September 20, 2022
Promoting trust in research and researchers: How open science and research integrity are intertwinedTamarinde Haven, Gowri Gopalakrishna, Joeri Tijdink, et al.Research Integrity and Peer Review|May 4, 2021
Explaining variance in perceived research misbehavior: results from a survey among academic researchers in AmsterdamTamarinde Haven, Joeri Tijdink, Brian Martinson, et al.Science and Engineering Ethics|August 12, 2020
Researchers' Perceptions of a Responsible Research Climate: A Multi Focus Group StudyTamarinde Haven, H Roeline Pasman, Guy Widdershoven, et al.Journal of Biomedical Informatics|December 3, 2022
Generating evidence on privacy outcomes to inform privacy risk management: A way forward?Daniel Strech, Tamarinde Haven, Vince I Madai, et al.Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics|July 4, 2025
A roadmap to good practice for training supervisors and leadership: a European perspectiveSeán Lacey, Tamarinde Haven, Rita Santos, et al.F1000Research|January 24, 2025
Expert Consensus Methods In The Humanities: An Exploration of their PotentialCharlotte C S Rulkens, Rik Peels, Lidwine B Mokkink, et al.Pageof 2