Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Filters

Thiemo J A van Nijnatten

Showing results (1-10 of 54) with videos related to

Pageof 6
Sort By:
EJNMMI Research|November 22, 2021
Value of <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT for predicting axillary pathologic complete response following neoadjuvant systemic therapy in breast cancer patients: emphasis on breast cancer subtypeCornelis M de Mooij, Cristina Mitea, Felix M Mottaghy, et al.
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment|April 22, 2019
Does every woman presenting with malignant calcifications require a post lumpectomy mammogram?Hálio Rodrigues-Duarte, Thiemo J A van Nijnatten, Tatiana Khoury, et al.
JPRAS Open|March 13, 2025
Prevalence of Silicone Lymphadenopathy in Women with Breast Implants: A single-center retrospective studyJuliënne A Berben, Esther M Heuts, Thiemo J A van Nijnatten, et al.
AJR. American Journal of Roentgenology|November 30, 2022
Barriers to Implementation of Contrast-Enhanced Mammography in Clinical Practice: <i>AJR</i> Expert Panel Narrative ReviewThiemo J A van Nijnatten, Marc B I Lobbes, Andrea Cozzi, et al.
Nuclear Medicine Communications|August 10, 2020
Diagnostic performance of PET/computed tomography versus PET/MRI and diffusion-weighted imaging in the N- and M-staging of breast cancer patientsCornelis Maarten de Mooij, Inés Sunen, Cristina Mitea, et al.
BJR Open|May 27, 2024
Imaging findings after a total reconstructed breast with autologous fat transfer: what the radiologist needs to knowMaud E P Rijkx, Esther M Heuts, Janneke B Houwers, et al.
EJNMMI Research|January 23, 2023
The influence of receptor expression and clinical subtypes on baseline [18F]FDG uptake in breast cancer: systematic review and meta-analysisCornelis M de Mooij, Roxanne A W Ploumen, Patty J Nelemans, et al.
Insights Into Imaging|June 22, 2026
A review of radiological characteristics and patterns of fat necrosis after different autologous breast surgery techniquesNieke N P M Smeins, Zoë M A Kuijlaars, Silvia Pérez Rodrigo, et al.
Annals of Surgery|October 13, 2018
Diagnostic Accuracy of Different Surgical Procedures for Axillary Staging After Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy in Node-positive Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysisJanine M Simons, Thiemo J A van Nijnatten, Carmen C van der Pol, et al.
European Radiology|March 30, 2020
Diagnostic performance of standard breast MRI compared to dedicated axillary MRI for assessment of node-negative and node-positive breast cancerSanaz Samiei, Marjolein L Smidt, Sigrid Vanwetswinkel, et al.
Pageof 6

Showing results (1-10 of 54) with videos related to

Sort By:
Pageof 6
EJNMMI Research|November 22, 2021
Value of <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT for predicting axillary pathologic complete response following neoadjuvant systemic therapy in breast cancer patients: emphasis on breast cancer subtypeCornelis M de Mooij, Cristina Mitea, Felix M Mottaghy, et al.
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment|April 22, 2019
Does every woman presenting with malignant calcifications require a post lumpectomy mammogram?Hálio Rodrigues-Duarte, Thiemo J A van Nijnatten, Tatiana Khoury, et al.
JPRAS Open|March 13, 2025
Prevalence of Silicone Lymphadenopathy in Women with Breast Implants: A single-center retrospective studyJuliënne A Berben, Esther M Heuts, Thiemo J A van Nijnatten, et al.
AJR. American Journal of Roentgenology|November 30, 2022
Barriers to Implementation of Contrast-Enhanced Mammography in Clinical Practice: <i>AJR</i> Expert Panel Narrative ReviewThiemo J A van Nijnatten, Marc B I Lobbes, Andrea Cozzi, et al.
Nuclear Medicine Communications|August 10, 2020
Diagnostic performance of PET/computed tomography versus PET/MRI and diffusion-weighted imaging in the N- and M-staging of breast cancer patientsCornelis Maarten de Mooij, Inés Sunen, Cristina Mitea, et al.
BJR Open|May 27, 2024
Imaging findings after a total reconstructed breast with autologous fat transfer: what the radiologist needs to knowMaud E P Rijkx, Esther M Heuts, Janneke B Houwers, et al.
EJNMMI Research|January 23, 2023
The influence of receptor expression and clinical subtypes on baseline [18F]FDG uptake in breast cancer: systematic review and meta-analysisCornelis M de Mooij, Roxanne A W Ploumen, Patty J Nelemans, et al.
Insights Into Imaging|June 22, 2026
A review of radiological characteristics and patterns of fat necrosis after different autologous breast surgery techniquesNieke N P M Smeins, Zoë M A Kuijlaars, Silvia Pérez Rodrigo, et al.
Annals of Surgery|October 13, 2018
Diagnostic Accuracy of Different Surgical Procedures for Axillary Staging After Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy in Node-positive Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysisJanine M Simons, Thiemo J A van Nijnatten, Carmen C van der Pol, et al.
European Radiology|March 30, 2020
Diagnostic performance of standard breast MRI compared to dedicated axillary MRI for assessment of node-negative and node-positive breast cancerSanaz Samiei, Marjolein L Smidt, Sigrid Vanwetswinkel, et al.
Pageof 6