Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Filters

Thomas Knoll

Showing results (71-80 of 164) with videos related to

Pageof 17
Sort By:
World Journal of Urology|October 15, 2016
Uncovering the real outcomes of active renal stone treatment by utilizing non-contrast computer tomography: a systematic review of the current literatureTheodoros Tokas, Martin Habicher, Daniel Junker, et al.
European Urology|July 6, 2007
980-nm Diode laser: a novel laser technology for vaporization of the prostateGunnar Wendt-Nordahl, Stephanie Huckele, Patrick Honeck, et al.
European Urology|June 1, 2005
5-year-follow-up of patients with clinically insignificant residual fragments after extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsyMahmoud M Osman, Yvonne Alfano, Stefan Kamp, et al.
Journal of Endourology|December 5, 2009
120 W lithium triborate laser for photoselective vaporization of the prostate: comparison with 80 W potassium-titanyl-phosphate laser in an ex-vivo modelElmar Heinrich, Gunnar Wendt-Nordahl, Patrick Honeck, et al.
Current Opinion in Urology|November 14, 2023
Single use flexible ureteroscopes: a review of current technologies and cost effectiveness analysisAli Talyshinskii, Vineet Gauhar, Daniele Castellani, et al.
Journal of Endourology|October 21, 2003
Measurement of renal anatomy for prediction of lower-pole caliceal stone clearance: reproducibility of different parametersThomas Knoll, Anton Musial, Lutz Trojan, et al.
The Journal of Urology|March 10, 2020
Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Comparing Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy, Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery and Shock Wave Lithotripsy for Lower Pole Renal Stones Less Than 2 cm in Maximum DiameterPanagiotis Kallidonis, Panteleimon Ntasiotis, Bhaskar Somani, et al.
BJU International|November 6, 2007
Prospective evaluation of acute endocrine pancreatic injury as collateral damage of shock-wave lithotripsy for upper urinary tract stonesGunnar Wendt-Nordahl, Patrick Krombach, Dieter Hannak, et al.
Journal of Endourology|December 20, 2005
New bipolar resection device for transurethral resection of the prostate: first ex-vivo and in-vivo evaluationGunnar Wendt-Nordahl, Axel Häcker, Karl Fastenmeier, et al.
Scandinavian Journal of Urology|March 25, 2016
Minimally invasive versus conventional large-bore percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the treatment of large-sized renal calculi: Surgeon's preference?Mohamed F Abdelhafez, Gunnar Wendt-Nordahl, Stefan Kruck, et al.
Pageof 17

Showing results (71-80 of 164) with videos related to

Sort By:
Pageof 17
World Journal of Urology|October 15, 2016
Uncovering the real outcomes of active renal stone treatment by utilizing non-contrast computer tomography: a systematic review of the current literatureTheodoros Tokas, Martin Habicher, Daniel Junker, et al.
European Urology|July 6, 2007
980-nm Diode laser: a novel laser technology for vaporization of the prostateGunnar Wendt-Nordahl, Stephanie Huckele, Patrick Honeck, et al.
European Urology|June 1, 2005
5-year-follow-up of patients with clinically insignificant residual fragments after extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsyMahmoud M Osman, Yvonne Alfano, Stefan Kamp, et al.
Journal of Endourology|December 5, 2009
120 W lithium triborate laser for photoselective vaporization of the prostate: comparison with 80 W potassium-titanyl-phosphate laser in an ex-vivo modelElmar Heinrich, Gunnar Wendt-Nordahl, Patrick Honeck, et al.
Current Opinion in Urology|November 14, 2023
Single use flexible ureteroscopes: a review of current technologies and cost effectiveness analysisAli Talyshinskii, Vineet Gauhar, Daniele Castellani, et al.
Journal of Endourology|October 21, 2003
Measurement of renal anatomy for prediction of lower-pole caliceal stone clearance: reproducibility of different parametersThomas Knoll, Anton Musial, Lutz Trojan, et al.
The Journal of Urology|March 10, 2020
Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Comparing Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy, Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery and Shock Wave Lithotripsy for Lower Pole Renal Stones Less Than 2 cm in Maximum DiameterPanagiotis Kallidonis, Panteleimon Ntasiotis, Bhaskar Somani, et al.
BJU International|November 6, 2007
Prospective evaluation of acute endocrine pancreatic injury as collateral damage of shock-wave lithotripsy for upper urinary tract stonesGunnar Wendt-Nordahl, Patrick Krombach, Dieter Hannak, et al.
Journal of Endourology|December 20, 2005
New bipolar resection device for transurethral resection of the prostate: first ex-vivo and in-vivo evaluationGunnar Wendt-Nordahl, Axel Häcker, Karl Fastenmeier, et al.
Scandinavian Journal of Urology|March 25, 2016
Minimally invasive versus conventional large-bore percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the treatment of large-sized renal calculi: Surgeon's preference?Mohamed F Abdelhafez, Gunnar Wendt-Nordahl, Stefan Kruck, et al.
Pageof 17